General Discussion

ALL of the posts you cite come after your post #19, as the post numbers make clear; and they are in response to your flury of duplicative subsequent posts in 2 separate subthreads, hence the large number of replies.

It is you who first entered this subthread, not me. It is you who entered this thread with your post #19, attacking Cha for showing support for Senator Booker, with a rolling eyes emoji.

That was followed by your post #22, also with a rolling eyes emoji. What is "telling" about a DUer supporting Booker? What are you implying about Cha there? Why won't you answer that question? Sure sounds like a nasty personal attack on Cha to me. But you refuse to even address THAT personal attack, let alone admit what you were implying.