Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Baitball Blogger

(51,584 posts)
Wed Oct 15, 2025, 07:44 PM Oct 15

So, can we all agree that Vance's statement that he was opposed to the young Republicans [View all]

losing their jobs over boys being boys is exactly the kind of perspective that is responsible for the kind of slimy Republicans we are dealing with today?

Not in any other American group I can think of, will you find where Nazi worshiping is considered a rite of passage to maturity.

Can we just agree that the definition of a boy is somewhere between 8 and 17? After that they are considered young men and at 18, they could even face criminal actions as an adult. The Young Republicans involved young men between the ages of 18 and 29,

I bet they're confused because their adult role models chuckle whenever they hear them say the same things. What they learned, was that they shouldn't be so obvious until they're president.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, can we all agree that...