Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Strange that we dissect a single mother's grocery cart... [View all]jfz9580m
(16,357 posts)37. I was reading this earlier today
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/11/trump-shutdown-snap-medicaid-benefits-jd-vance-pro-natalist/
I am certainly not antinatalist, but I am opposed to pronatalism whether its in the Global North or the South. I think we should take care of all the people from the elderly/disabled to babies and children already on earth over Cornucopian callousness that treats people as disposable. Most pronatalism is not sourced to any concern for womens rights or liking of kids. Its about accelerating chaos and borrowing the reproductive strategies you see in the wild which are not a good fit obviously for humans.
It strikes me that these guys think exactly opposite to that. More babies yes..how they are taken care of..fuck that. They seem to be going for the animal model of survival. Thats completely uncivilized.
The fallacy Cato etc have cunningly created in the public mind is coupling acknowledgment of the limits to the growth with these cruel and fascistic policies against the poor.
I am certainly not antinatalist, but I am opposed to pronatalism whether its in the Global North or the South. I think we should take care of all the people from the elderly/disabled to babies and children already on earth over Cornucopian callousness that treats people as disposable. Most pronatalism is not sourced to any concern for womens rights or liking of kids. Its about accelerating chaos and borrowing the reproductive strategies you see in the wild which are not a good fit obviously for humans.
It strikes me that these guys think exactly opposite to that. More babies yes..how they are taken care of..fuck that. They seem to be going for the animal model of survival. Thats completely uncivilized.
The fallacy Cato etc have cunningly created in the public mind is coupling acknowledgment of the limits to the growth with these cruel and fascistic policies against the poor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jeff Bezos, heavily subsidized by the US taxpayer, spent $60 million on his recent wedding.
Irish_Dem
Nov 3
#15
Don't forget the gofing outings that have cost us 71 million so far in 2025!
HeartsCanHope
Nov 3
#25
A few days ago I saw a MSM article discussing SNAP benefits while zeroing in on numerous shopping carts.
flashman13
Nov 3
#12
They don't want to know that these parents are working 3-4 jobs and the kids have to feed themselves.
Clouds Passing
Nov 3
#22
The billionaires are and have been buying the government they want, just like FDR warned. nt
ShazamIam
Nov 3
#14
there are some that see no problem with this. the attitude seems to be i am paying for that why are you getting it.
dawn5651
Nov 3
#17
i was behind a woman in tn who had food stamps or the childrens one..and the cashier was rude..went thru every thing
dawn5651
Nov 4
#36