Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(9,778 posts)
12. Sorry, but there's no evidence that I'm aware of that they "inserted" that photo into the files
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 07:44 PM
Dec 20

It's very possible that photo was among the photos in Epstein's possession. There were tens of thousands of them and they weren't all taken by Epstein or at one of his properties. There are other publicly available photos among those that they have released alread that were in Epstein's possession.

Now I will agree they released that photo on purpose to try to implicate Clinton in "something".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R orangecrush Dec 20 #1
When Lying, Fraud, and Criminality in General Are Your Only Practiced Skills The Roux Comes First Dec 20 #2
True. littlemissmartypants Dec 20 #7
K & R n/t TubbersUK Dec 20 #3
They're just making it worse for themselves. Ocelot II Dec 20 #4
That's how bad the evidence really is: They think a blatant coverup is less damaging. (nt) William Seger Dec 21 #29
That's what happens in banana republics with no accountability Justice matters. Dec 21 #31
Off to the hoosegow! surfered Dec 20 #5
If only. littlemissmartypants Dec 20 #8
It's the coverup that gets them every time. C_U_L8R Dec 20 #6
I have to ask, don't we have agents that were fired, that bluestarone Dec 20 #9
GOP Guardians Of Pedophiles Emile Dec 20 #10
They're just going to throw in photos of Dems, and think no one will notice Bayard Dec 20 #11
Sorry, but there's no evidence that I'm aware of that they "inserted" that photo into the files Wiz Imp Dec 20 #12
If i am understanding this correctly..... usedtobedemgurl Dec 20 #17
I had the same thought. IF its criminal, youll NEVER prove intent (with that) Volaris Dec 20 #18
It's also possible that it was not in the Epstein files MadameButterfly Dec 20 #20
All I want for a Xmas present: Aussie105 Dec 20 #13
It seems like someone along the way will have had enough. However MadameButterfly Dec 20 #21
Isn't there a way to un-redact these documents electronically? travelingthrulife Dec 21 #30
Just How Fucking Stupid is the Cha Dec 20 #14
His brain is disintegrating. MadameButterfly Dec 20 #22
Not sure Stephen Miller isn't Cha Dec 20 #23
I'm guessing Miller is a malignant narcissist MadameButterfly Dec 20 #24
Well to be fair, that particular picture should have been taken down, in my view AZJonnie Dec 20 #15
Not to worry. Norm Eisen (and probably others) downloaded them before they were deleted. Fil1957 Dec 20 #16
Everyone knows LilElf70 Dec 20 #19
These people are all going to end up in prison.. Joinfortmill Dec 21 #25
They know we know what they're doing Coldwater Dec 21 #26
The big FU... Hugin Dec 21 #27
The BBFU -- VTderry Dec 21 #28
Who's got those 16 files? What do they say? nt. druidity33 Dec 21 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ongoing evidence tamperin...»Reply #12