Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Emrys

(9,207 posts)
22. What BS yourself. Nobody has to "worship" a celeb to be opposed to mendacious hate campaigns.
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 06:46 PM
Dec 2025

You know what's weird? Someone who's apparently consumed by hate about someone they''ll almost certainly never meet, who has at most an infinitesimal impact on their life circumstances, and doesn't even know they exist. Reddit, for instance, seems to be a magnet for such people. On DU, we generally try to reserve those sorts of emotions for the real bastards in this world who are seriously hurting others, and there's no shortage of them.

Since you seem not have bothered surveying the ruins of your threads from yesterday, I'll take the liberty of quoting in isolation FascismIsDeath's rebuttal and correction of your caricature of the study on the wealthy and flight ecological impacts you referred to, since you didn't deign to reply to him:

You should've actually read the study (that you didn't even bother linking to)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-025-02325-x#Sec5

Here is a sentence in the "Discussion" section of the study that essentially summarizes everything I said..

"Wealth-based emissions comprise private consumption and investment in capital formation across production sectors that supply goods and services consumed by society. Recognizing the associated unequal warming contributions can inform policy interventions."

And a few paragraphs later...

"Similarly, the warming attributable to the investments of the wealthy underscores the need to realign financial flows to meet global climate goals32. This is particularly relevant for the wealthiest 1% and 0.1%, whose transboundary contributions to worsening local extremes arise primarily through investments, rather than consumption."

In other words, its EXACTLY what I said, governments bought and paid for by big money interests... they are saying the exact same thing in this study. The wealthy invested in big fossil fuels and big agriculture and big transportation and manufacturing technologies and they also used their wealth to buy off governments from standing in the way of them profiting from those investments which, as the study says "supply goods and services consumed by society", in other words.... all of us, continuing to buy their shit, mostly because we don't have another choice if we want to continue existing in the modern world.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20896465


No, I can't be arsed going yet another round about the MAGA allegations because they're desperately thin, numerous people responded about those accusations and attempts at guilt by association of yours yesterday and I'd just be repeating what many of them said, and as the article I linked above points out, that sort of well-meaning engagement just ends up promoting the bot bilge anyway.

As someone who proclaimed several times yesterday that this is a discussion forum, you don't seem particularly interested in following up that discussion by actually reading and digesting what people bother to reply to you. One might almost be as well conversing with a bot.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

By the end of World War II we had nuclear weapons, relatively small nuclear weapons. Jim__ Dec 2025 #1
If one goes up at supersonic speeds, all the others go up. Justice matters. Dec 2025 #23
Yes, and the cure for diabetes is a diet of only doughnuts and candy bucolic_frolic Dec 2025 #2
and 1 azzwhole to reverse 250 years of progress rampartd Dec 2025 #3
There are still selfish troglodytes. haele Dec 2025 #4
Yes, but we used to not listen to them. OldBaldy1701E Dec 2025 #25
The internet. Used to be, the crazies would have to drive to 'conferences' Volaris Dec 2025 #27
Yep. OldBaldy1701E Dec 2025 #29
This book is really sobering SamuelTheThird Dec 2025 #5
I heard Taylor Swift is mentioned in Revelations. BannonsLiver Dec 2025 #8
I apologize SamuelTheThird Dec 2025 #9
No check that, I heard she's a prize in a Cracker Jack box. BannonsLiver Dec 2025 #14
I think most of us would settle for your not spreading RW BS from bot farms on DU Emrys Dec 2025 #15
Straw man argument SamuelTheThird Dec 2025 #17
Another attempt at dodging from you after your bravura performance yesterday. It'll fare as well. Emrys Dec 2025 #19
What bs SamuelTheThird Dec 2025 #20
What BS yourself. Nobody has to "worship" a celeb to be opposed to mendacious hate campaigns. Emrys Dec 2025 #22
... BannonsLiver Jan 2026 #30
... BannonsLiver Jan 2026 #31
The crisis, when it comes canetoad Dec 2025 #6
And democracy is not the default setting 31st Street Bridge Dec 2025 #24
That would only be a temporary solution. BannonsLiver Dec 2025 #7
Can't supply cat-harsis, but here's... GJGCA Dec 2025 #10
I'll take it. 3catwoman3 Dec 2025 #16
Humanity will never "straighten out it's act". maxsolomon Dec 2025 #11
Sad but true... GJGCA Dec 2025 #13
Foundation Series OC375 Dec 2025 #12
The doctor's orders in "Dracula: Dead and Loving It"... BH liberal Dec 2025 #18
A WWIII would be the end of humans with all the nukes flying Bayard Dec 2025 #21
I believe Einstein was quoted as saying: Wounded Bear Dec 2025 #26
An AI engineered virus is inevitable now I fear Ponietz Dec 2025 #28
I agree Red Mountain Jan 2026 #35
I don't know, to be frank. MineralMan Jan 2026 #32
The human race hasn't figured out any other way but war or ethnic cleansing. Boomerproud Jan 2026 #33
It could definitely use some dismantling of dedicated propaganda machines JHB Jan 2026 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does the human race need ...»Reply #22