Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(2,270 posts)
17. Every solution has its hazards
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 09:50 PM
Wednesday

If the money supply were controlled by a government bureaucracy, they would likely be too slow to react to changes in the economic situation.

And then if a criminal like Trump came into power, he could simply just start putting money into his own accounts. He is doing that anyway, but at least not by having the fiat currency handed to him.

So there is an argument for the independence of the Fed. But that argument fails without transparency and accountability. This is why people like Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders have been right on the money (so to speak) when they demand the Fed must operate transparently, including passing regular public audits.

This ought to be the minimum requirement for having an independent organization control the money. But as I have mentioned above, the Fed no longer controls the money supply in a meaningful way. The cryptocurrencies are, de facto, part of our money supply. And the insane bubble stocks are behaving, more than any time in our history, like currency. The mag-7 stocks have $23 TRILLION of stock in circulation, compared to only $2.4 trillion of US currency in circulation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Amy Berman Jackson ...»Reply #17