Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

turbinetree

(27,215 posts)
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 03:11 PM Jan 5

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dire warning comes true: study [View all]

By Alexander Willis
Published January 5, 2026 1:52 PM ET

Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned last summer that her conservative colleagues on the bench were doing irreparable harm to the court’s image as they increasingly sided with the rich and powerful, and a new study published Monday appeared to validate those fears.

Published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, the study found that since the 1950s, conservative Supreme Court justices increasingly issued rulings that favored the wealthy when compared to their liberal counterparts.

Researchers analyzed 1,782 Supreme Court cases and classified justices’ votes as either “pro-rich” – which they defined as a vote that produced an “outcome [that] would directly shift resources to the party that is more likely to be wealthy” – or “pro-poor.” Researchers found that conservative justices cast “pro-rich” votes 70% of the time by the end of 2022, a stark contrast to liberal justices’ 35% during the same time period.

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-2674849387/

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This one simple trick can fix all that: Fiendish Thingy Jan 5 #1
This................ turbinetree Jan 5 #2
Along with .... lastlib Jan 5 #3
This............. turbinetree Jan 5 #7
No. It doesn't fix it as it can be increased then by the Republicans and we'd have unending escalation. cstanleytech Jan 5 #5
Amendments are more difficult than laws, and we must never again fail to act due to fear of what republicans might do. Fiendish Thingy Jan 5 #6
Presidential Administrations have been different Parties four times in a row now Polybius Jan 5 #8
As they say in the investment world: Fiendish Thingy Jan 5 #10
I am supporting Gavin, who I think can serve two terms Polybius Jan 5 #11
You've decided who the best candidate is before the campaign has begun? Fiendish Thingy Jan 5 #12
I am open to changing my mind Polybius Jan 6 #15
Charisma indeed sells Fiendish Thingy Jan 6 #16
Yes, they are more difficult but it's actually the only real way to reduce this type of bullshit being forced on us. cstanleytech Jan 6 #14
One problem with this idea: Repugs own the Senate and the White House JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 6 #17
Of course I was speaking of 2029 Fiendish Thingy Jan 6 #18
Ok, but if it's so easy, I'm surprised the Repugs don't jump on it today. JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 6 #19
Not to forget... BurnDoubt Jan 5 #4
Our nation and our Democracy is a sham kwolf68 Jan 5 #9
Sadly I think things are already "pretty bad" Dave says Jan 5 #13
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Justice Ket...