Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mike Niendorff

(3,645 posts)
1. I would vote "combinations of the above", but ...
Sun Jan 11, 2026, 07:04 AM
Jan 11

... but there are a lot of options in there that I really don't think are in the mix.

If I had to seriously answer, I'd say this:

* Putin, and his gangster circles
* MBS, and his gangster circles
* a trans-national circle of billionaires (Musk, Thiel, Adelson, Koch, etc), with Musk in particular trying to establish control over "the means of communication" so that he can control *dialog* on literally everything, and so he can advantage/disadvantage state-level actors to elevate them or diminish them at will. This will not end well for Musk.
* Organized crime -- whoever Trump has been working with since his early days (and probably his daddy's days). Trace out the groups Trump lifts up -- and those he pushes down -- and it's a roadmap to which criminal organizations he's directly involved with. And there are lots. And yes, they are 100% involved in child-trafficking.
* American Evangelical Churches -- the new homebase of the klan, neo-segregationists, Nazis, and general racists of all types, bound by a shared "end times" (black pill / accellerationist) ideology and a pure hatred of anyone culturally or physically different from themselves. Notably absent are any actual teachings even slightly resembling Christianity. These are "culture war" and "end times" churches -- and they have money, followers, private/segregated schools, and are tax-advantaged to the point of criminality.

And yeah, there are lots of others.

But these are the ones I really see pulling the strings -- or at least as the "big strings" that themselves get pulled and played by the real top guys.

Now, don't get me started on their money networks, their recruitment networks, their *massive* propaganda operations ... yeah, way to much to cover in a late-night off-the-cuff post like this. I'm sure others will do way better, so I leave it to them.


MDN

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

who is really in charge? [View all] rampartd Jan 11 OP
I would vote "combinations of the above", but ... Mike Niendorff Jan 11 #1
i considered the fundies rampartd Jan 11 #2
Putin, Billionaires, and Bettie Jan 11 #3
i think of the flamboyant christian as someone rampartd Jan 11 #6
I still don't understand how Bettie Jan 11 #8
Melania SocialDemocrat61 Jan 11 #4
No one is in charge Johonny Jan 11 #5
Stephen Miller. OldBaldy1701E Jan 11 #7
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»who is really in charge?»Reply #1