Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

usonian

(25,300 posts)
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 09:07 PM Monday

Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims [View all]

Last edited Mon Mar 30, 2026, 11:26 PM - Edit history (1)

From The Daily Mail but likely to be true.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15692625/Tyler-Robinson-bullet-rifle-match-Charlie-Kirk.html

The bullet that killed conservative commentator Charlie Kirk did not match the rifle used by suspected killer Tyler Robinson, a bombshell new court filing states.

snip

... His defense attorneys now argue that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives 'was unable to identify the bullet recovered at autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Mr Robinson.'

The defense team may now offer the ATF firearm analyst's testimony as exculpatory evidence, they said in a motion filed on Friday to push the preliminary hearing back at least six months, Fox News reports.

It also notes that DNA reports filed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and ATF will take time for the defense team to analyze because reports indicated that several different DNA were found on some items of evidence.


Checking satellites for evidence of a grassy knoll.

No link at the Daily Mail to more, but others may. MSN syndicated the story.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/bullet-used-to-kill-charlie-kirk-did-not-match-rifle-allegedly-used-by-suspect-tyler-robinson/ar-AA1ZLsle

Edit to add. I did not intend to promote conspiracy theories, only to say REPUBLICANS IN DISARRAY.
Let them tear each other apart (verbally, of course.)

I looked for independent sources. So far, everyone is just copying the DailyMail, so Caveat Reader.
A search for corroboration!! Unfortunately, it has only been found so far at.
• Hindustan Times
• EndTimeHeadlines
https://the.democraticunderground.org/100221135837 (so DU has another name? )
• FreeRepubic FREEPERS (this is interesting) Little did I know, they are HQ in Fresno. Yuck.,

I put the discussion so far up on pastebin, so you don't have to go there.
https://pastebin.com/raw/ZUKWyWmc
FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! EACH OTHER!
81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I thought this was fishy from the start. n/t rzemanfl Monday #1
Defense lawyer claims client is innocent EdmondDantes_ Monday #2
Is there a grassy knoll around somewhere? Ocelot II Monday #3
Patsy dweller Monday #4
This was a professional hit...................... Lovie777 Monday #5
Yup, it certainly was blue-wave Monday #29
This is your brain on conspiracy theories. nt BootinUp Monday #6
Thank you ! stopdiggin Monday #11
People still don't believe the Warren commission even after the shooting BootinUp Monday #13
there is no end to the lunacy that the 'conspiracy brain' will gobble up .... - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin Monday #18
So by saying "lunacy" blue-wave 16 hrs ago #59
When I see evidence..... SergeStorms 15 hrs ago #62
this lab 'finding' does NOT say that the bullet did not come from the indicated gun stopdiggin 10 hrs ago #72
Numerous people in the operating at the hospital saw that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off. everyonematters Monday #27
you could see after he was shot Jackie trying to climb out the back of the convertible, as if chasing his head. Trueblue Texan Yesterday #43
So we are supposed believe that blue-wave 16 hrs ago #58
. BootinUp 14 hrs ago #63
The facts are that the House assassinations Committe found there was a conspiracy. Rafi 9 hrs ago #76
Based on a faulty analysis of the audio. Throw that 2nd finding in the trash. nt BootinUp 8 hrs ago #78
Oh Lawd, there's a budding cottage industry of conspiracy theories on the RW alone. underpants Monday #21
I WISH somebody ELSE had had a 'good rifle'---- Jack Valentino Monday #41
Like the tRump fake assasination attempt that went wrong I have no doubt. nt yaesu Monday #7
a very neat trick - given that the shooter TOLD other people that he did it stopdiggin Monday #8
Why did they pin the murder Blue_Roses Monday #9
He - a) confessed to roommate - b) stashed a rifle easily identified as belonging to him/family in nearby bushes stopdiggin Monday #16
Weird Blue_Roses Monday #20
Post removed Post removed Yesterday #47
Oh boy... RockRaven Monday #10
When ATF or some other forensic lab can't definitely match a bullet, they say so Prairie Gates Monday #12
Exactly right. Straw Man Monday #15
I did notice that the defense didn't say that the ATF dgauss Monday #17
I haven't followed the story much rpannier Monday #30
And so gentle readers, another conspiracy is born . . . Aussie105 Monday #35
Nope. Not a rabbit hole I'm going doen. Not for this guy. OAITW r.2.0 Monday #14
Hard to tell whether the defense is saying the bullet doesn't match the caliber of the rifle, or if it's pushing what WhiskeyGrinder Monday #19
One of the many "marks matching" forensic "sciences" that is of dubious reliability Prairie Gates Monday #23
Yep. Bite ID, blood spatter, fingerprints...whatever it takes to keep the PIC running. WhiskeyGrinder Monday #25
Fire/burn/accelerant marks. Polygraphs. RockRaven Monday #26
Carpet and fabric fibers Johnny2X2X Monday #33
"Tool marks" and other nonsense pseudoscience Prairie Gates 19 hrs ago #52
I believe the lawyer is purposely being deceptive Bluetus 9 hrs ago #77
It's a defense claim Renew Deal Monday #22
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Monday #24
My guess is that the bullet hit something hard after passing thru Kirk's neck NickB79 Monday #28
The story says "... the bullet recovered at autopsy..." Mariana 12 hrs ago #68
Wherever it was recovered, it wasn't anywhere in his body NickB79 7 hrs ago #81
The only evidence we should care about are vague engravings on bullets IronLionZion Monday #31
Trump wanted this to be federal case. Wonder why? 33taw Monday #32
Wow. More questions than answers. Joinfortmill Monday #34
What questions? Aussie105 Monday #36
Amazing deduction. Joinfortmill 20 hrs ago #50
How do we know he is dead? sarisataka Monday #37
Crazy theories? Let's go! Danascot 20 hrs ago #49
Depends, is my next option to almost make out with JD Vance? EdmondDantes_ 12 hrs ago #69
If you saw the video before it was taken down, NH Ethylene 10 hrs ago #70
I did see it and personally have no doubts sarisataka 9 hrs ago #73
COLOR. ME. SHOCKED. MrChuck Monday #38
My theory that Erika had something to do with it still stands. Initech 17 hrs ago #56
Probably means bullet was too damaged to be able to match it to the rifle Kaleva Monday #39
A nice, sensible response to this new evidence. Ilikepurple Yesterday #44
Good! Unrepentant Fenian Monday #40
Shocking. C Moon Monday #42
is there a link to the court filing? onenote Yesterday #45
I've been looking, and everything points back to the DailyMail. usonian Yesterday #46
Below is a link to CBS news Quiet Em 21 hrs ago #48
Lawyer being a lawyer Johnny2X2X 20 hrs ago #51
It was a fragment Historic NY 18 hrs ago #53
Ahhh, cooler heads BaronChocula 16 hrs ago #60
That's a rough row to hoe given that the suspect confessed the murder to allegorical oracle 17 hrs ago #54
Uh oh, this is going to disrupt Fox News' narrative. Initech 17 hrs ago #55
It was an inside job. idahoblue 17 hrs ago #57
I actually hope it doesn't match. Iggo 16 hrs ago #61
Hindustan Times seems to be a go-to for planted narratives lostnfound 13 hrs ago #64
I'd pull the OP in an instant if someone refuted it, but none so far. usonian 13 hrs ago #65
The body of the article itself refutes the title of the OP Kaleva 10 hrs ago #71
With Ca$h, Blondi and Juice Box Jeanine involved Hassler 13 hrs ago #66
I wouldn't put it past them to have set up the Trump ear shot, and the Kirk one LiberalLovinLug 13 hrs ago #67
So does this mean Charlie Kirk was not killed -- or does it mean he was only an AI deep fake who never existed? struggle4progress 9 hrs ago #74
My money's on two strong candidates. usonian 9 hrs ago #75
That is a reassuring thought! struggle4progress 7 hrs ago #79
This is an attorney tactic to try and get his client off. There is video of him on the roof and jumping from Pisces 7 hrs ago #80
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bullet used to kill Charl...