General Discussion

Renew Deal

(85,144 posts)

22. It's a defense claim

Mon Mar 30, 2026, 09:54 PM

Monday

But it would be notable if it was impossible for the bullet to work with the gun.

Multiple DNA is probably law enforcement contamination.

The conspiracy people including Candace Owens will go wild with this info

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rictofen MolecularDust LeftInTX

81 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims [View all] usonian Monday OP

I thought this was fishy from the start. n/t rzemanfl Monday #1

Defense lawyer claims client is innocent EdmondDantes_ Monday #2

Is there a grassy knoll around somewhere? Ocelot II Monday #3

Patsy dweller Monday #4

This was a professional hit...................... Lovie777 Monday #5

Yup, it certainly was blue-wave Monday #29

This is your brain on conspiracy theories. nt BootinUp Monday #6

Thank you ! stopdiggin Monday #11

People still don't believe the Warren commission even after the shooting BootinUp Monday #13

there is no end to the lunacy that the 'conspiracy brain' will gobble up .... - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin Monday #18

So by saying "lunacy" blue-wave 18 hrs ago #59

When I see evidence..... SergeStorms 17 hrs ago #62

this lab 'finding' does NOT say that the bullet did not come from the indicated gun stopdiggin 11 hrs ago #72

Numerous people in the operating at the hospital saw that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off. everyonematters Monday #27

you could see after he was shot Jackie trying to climb out the back of the convertible, as if chasing his head. Trueblue Texan Yesterday #43

So we are supposed believe that blue-wave 18 hrs ago #58

. BootinUp 16 hrs ago #63

The facts are that the House assassinations Committe found there was a conspiracy. Rafi 11 hrs ago #76

Based on a faulty analysis of the audio. Throw that 2nd finding in the trash. nt BootinUp 10 hrs ago #78

Oh Lawd, there's a budding cottage industry of conspiracy theories on the RW alone. underpants Monday #21

I WISH somebody ELSE had had a 'good rifle'---- Jack Valentino Monday #41

Like the tRump fake assasination attempt that went wrong I have no doubt. nt yaesu Monday #7

a very neat trick - given that the shooter TOLD other people that he did it stopdiggin Monday #8

Why did they pin the murder Blue_Roses Monday #9

He - a) confessed to roommate - b) stashed a rifle easily identified as belonging to him/family in nearby bushes stopdiggin Monday #16

Weird Blue_Roses Monday #20

Post removed Post removed Yesterday #47

Oh boy... RockRaven Monday #10

When ATF or some other forensic lab can't definitely match a bullet, they say so Prairie Gates Monday #12

Exactly right. Straw Man Monday #15

I did notice that the defense didn't say that the ATF dgauss Monday #17

I haven't followed the story much rpannier Monday #30

And so gentle readers, another conspiracy is born . . . Aussie105 Monday #35

Nope. Not a rabbit hole I'm going doen. Not for this guy. OAITW r.2.0 Monday #14

Hard to tell whether the defense is saying the bullet doesn't match the caliber of the rifle, or if it's pushing what WhiskeyGrinder Monday #19

One of the many "marks matching" forensic "sciences" that is of dubious reliability Prairie Gates Monday #23

Yep. Bite ID, blood spatter, fingerprints...whatever it takes to keep the PIC running. WhiskeyGrinder Monday #25

Fire/burn/accelerant marks. Polygraphs. RockRaven Monday #26

Carpet and fabric fibers Johnny2X2X Monday #33

"Tool marks" and other nonsense pseudoscience Prairie Gates 21 hrs ago #52

I believe the lawyer is purposely being deceptive Bluetus 11 hrs ago #77

It's a defense claim Renew Deal Monday #22

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Monday #24

My guess is that the bullet hit something hard after passing thru Kirk's neck NickB79 Monday #28

The story says "... the bullet recovered at autopsy..." Mariana 14 hrs ago #68

Wherever it was recovered, it wasn't anywhere in his body NickB79 9 hrs ago #81

The only evidence we should care about are vague engravings on bullets IronLionZion Monday #31

Trump wanted this to be federal case. Wonder why? 33taw Monday #32

Wow. More questions than answers. Joinfortmill Monday #34

What questions? Aussie105 Monday #36

Amazing deduction. Joinfortmill 22 hrs ago #50

How do we know he is dead? sarisataka Monday #37

Crazy theories? Let's go! Danascot 22 hrs ago #49

Depends, is my next option to almost make out with JD Vance? EdmondDantes_ 14 hrs ago #69

If you saw the video before it was taken down, NH Ethylene 11 hrs ago #70

I did see it and personally have no doubts sarisataka 11 hrs ago #73

COLOR. ME. SHOCKED. MrChuck Monday #38

My theory that Erika had something to do with it still stands. Initech 19 hrs ago #56

Probably means bullet was too damaged to be able to match it to the rifle Kaleva Monday #39

A nice, sensible response to this new evidence. Ilikepurple Yesterday #44

Good! Unrepentant Fenian Monday #40

Shocking. C Moon Monday #42

is there a link to the court filing? onenote Yesterday #45

I've been looking, and everything points back to the DailyMail. usonian Yesterday #46

Below is a link to CBS news Quiet Em 23 hrs ago #48

Lawyer being a lawyer Johnny2X2X 21 hrs ago #51

It was a fragment Historic NY 19 hrs ago #53

Ahhh, cooler heads BaronChocula 18 hrs ago #60

That's a rough row to hoe given that the suspect confessed the murder to allegorical oracle 19 hrs ago #54

Uh oh, this is going to disrupt Fox News' narrative. Initech 19 hrs ago #55

It was an inside job. idahoblue 18 hrs ago #57

I actually hope it doesn't match. Iggo 18 hrs ago #61

Hindustan Times seems to be a go-to for planted narratives lostnfound 15 hrs ago #64

I'd pull the OP in an instant if someone refuted it, but none so far. usonian 15 hrs ago #65

The body of the article itself refutes the title of the OP Kaleva 11 hrs ago #71

With Ca$h, Blondi and Juice Box Jeanine involved Hassler 15 hrs ago #66

I wouldn't put it past them to have set up the Trump ear shot, and the Kirk one LiberalLovinLug 14 hrs ago #67

So does this mean Charlie Kirk was not killed -- or does it mean he was only an AI deep fake who never existed? struggle4progress 11 hrs ago #74

My money's on two strong candidates. usonian 11 hrs ago #75

That is a reassuring thought! struggle4progress 9 hrs ago #79

This is an attorney tactic to try and get his client off. There is video of him on the roof and jumping from Pisces 9 hrs ago #80