General Discussion

blue-wave

(5,097 posts)

59. So by saying "lunacy"

Tue Mar 31, 2026, 01:18 PM

4 hrs ago

you are saying the bullet that was shot from this gun really did kill Charlie Kirk? And you are calling others conspiracy theorists? The science of ballistics don't match in this case. You don't believe in Ballistics testing?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

blue-wave PittBlue

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims [View all] usonian 20 hrs ago OP

I thought this was fishy from the start. n/t rzemanfl 20 hrs ago #1

Defense lawyer claims client is innocent EdmondDantes_ 20 hrs ago #2

Is there a grassy knoll around somewhere? Ocelot II 20 hrs ago #3

Patsy dweller 20 hrs ago #4

This was a professional hit...................... Lovie777 20 hrs ago #5

Yup, it certainly was blue-wave 19 hrs ago #29

This is your brain on conspiracy theories. nt BootinUp 20 hrs ago #6

Thank you ! stopdiggin 20 hrs ago #11

People still don't believe the Warren commission even after the shooting BootinUp 20 hrs ago #13

there is no end to the lunacy that the 'conspiracy brain' will gobble up .... - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin 20 hrs ago #18

So by saying "lunacy" blue-wave 4 hrs ago #59

When I see evidence..... SergeStorms 3 hrs ago #62

Numerous people in the operating at the hospital saw that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off. everyonematters 19 hrs ago #27

you could see after he was shot Jackie trying to climb out the back of the convertible, as if chasing his head. Trueblue Texan 17 hrs ago #43

So we are supposed believe that blue-wave 4 hrs ago #58

. BootinUp 2 hrs ago #63

Oh Lawd, there's a budding cottage industry of conspiracy theories on the RW alone. underpants 19 hrs ago #21

I WISH somebody ELSE had had a 'good rifle'---- Jack Valentino 18 hrs ago #41

Like the tRump fake assasination attempt that went wrong I have no doubt. nt yaesu 20 hrs ago #7

a very neat trick - given that the shooter TOLD other people that did it stopdiggin 20 hrs ago #8

Why did they pin the murder Blue_Roses 20 hrs ago #9

He - a) confessed to roommate - b) stashed a rifle easily identified as belonging to him/family in nearby bushes stopdiggin 20 hrs ago #16

Weird Blue_Roses 20 hrs ago #20

Post removed Post removed 16 hrs ago #47

Oh boy... RockRaven 20 hrs ago #10

When ATF or some other forensic lab can't definitely match a bullet, they say so Prairie Gates 20 hrs ago #12

Exactly right. Straw Man 20 hrs ago #15

I did notice that the defense didn't say that the ATF dgauss 20 hrs ago #17

I haven't followed the story much rpannier 19 hrs ago #30

And so gentle readers, another conspiracy is born . . . Aussie105 18 hrs ago #35

Nope. Not a rabbit hole I'm going doen. Not for this guy. OAITW r.2.0 20 hrs ago #14

Hard to tell whether the defense is saying the bullet doesn't match the caliber of the rifle, or if it's pushing what WhiskeyGrinder 20 hrs ago #19

One of the many "marks matching" forensic "sciences" that is of dubious reliability Prairie Gates 19 hrs ago #23

Yep. Bite ID, blood spatter, fingerprints...whatever it takes to keep the PIC running. WhiskeyGrinder 19 hrs ago #25

Fire/burn/accelerant marks. Polygraphs. RockRaven 19 hrs ago #26

Carpet and fabric fibers Johnny2X2X 18 hrs ago #33

"Tool marks" and other nonsense pseudoscience Prairie Gates 7 hrs ago #52

It's a defense claim Renew Deal 19 hrs ago #22

Now watch them say that Charlie Kirk's bullet matches Luigi Mangione's gun... PeaceWave 19 hrs ago #24

My guess is that the bullet hit something hard after passing thru Kirk's neck NickB79 19 hrs ago #28

The story says "... the bullet recovered at autopsy..." Mariana 20 min ago #68

The only evidence we should care about are vague engravings on bullets IronLionZion 19 hrs ago #31

Trump wanted this to be federal case. Wonder why? 33taw 19 hrs ago #32

Wow. More questions than answers. Joinfortmill 18 hrs ago #34

What questions? Aussie105 18 hrs ago #36

Amazing deduction. Joinfortmill 8 hrs ago #50

How do we know he is dead? sarisataka 18 hrs ago #37

Crazy theories? Let's go! Danascot 8 hrs ago #49

Depends, is my next option to almost make out with JD Vance? EdmondDantes_ 14 min ago #69

COLOR. ME. SHOCKED. MrChuck 18 hrs ago #38

My theory that Erika had something to do with it still stands. Initech 5 hrs ago #56

Probably means bullet was too damaged to be able to match it to the rifle Kaleva 18 hrs ago #39

A nice, sensible response to this new evidence. Ilikepurple 16 hrs ago #44

Good! Unrepentant Fenian 18 hrs ago #40

Shocking. C Moon 17 hrs ago #42

is there a link to the court filing? onenote 16 hrs ago #45

I've been looking, and everything points back to the DailyMail. usonian 16 hrs ago #46

Below is a link to CBS news Quiet Em 9 hrs ago #48

Lawyer being a lawyer Johnny2X2X 8 hrs ago #51

It was a fragment Historic NY 6 hrs ago #53

Ahhh, cooler heads BaronChocula 4 hrs ago #60

That's a rough row to hoe given that the suspect confessed the murder to allegorical oracle 5 hrs ago #54

Uh oh, this is going to disrupt Fox News' narrative. Initech 5 hrs ago #55

It was an inside job. idahoblue 4 hrs ago #57

I actually hope it doesn't match. Iggo 4 hrs ago #61

Hindustan Times seems to be a go-to for planted narratives lostnfound 1 hr ago #64

I'd pull the OP in an instant if someone refuted it, but none so far. usonian 1 hr ago #65

With Ca$h, Blondi and Juice Box Jeanine involved Hassler 1 hr ago #66

I wouldn't put it past them to have set up the Trump ear shot, and the Kirk one LiberalLovinLug 50 min ago #67