Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pat_k

(13,744 posts)
20. No need to be broke for long. All it would take is a one-time levy on billionaires.
Tue Apr 28, 2026, 12:26 PM
Tuesday

A "down payment to the nation for the bounty you've earned on our backs" levy. It could definitely cover the existing deficit as we re-calibrate priorities and, at a minimum, repeal the tax cut on household income over $300,000 or so.

They would barely feel it. Instead of shoveling bribes at the regime, they would just be putting the dollars directly into the nation's coffers.

Here's what Gemini had to say: A one-time 20% levy on American billionaire wealth could potentially collect over $1.6 trillion, based on estimates that 938 U.S. billionaires held $8.2 trillion in collective wealth as of early 2026. This proposed 20% tax—distinct from a 20% income tax proposal—targets total net worth rather than just annual income.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed Post removed Tuesday #1
Trump is giving Taxpayers the idea there's trillions in government Mr.Bee Tuesday #2
"Me." Kid Berwyn Tuesday #10
No need to be broke for long. All it would take is a one-time levy on billionaires. pat_k Tuesday #20
First it was to be paid for by bribes..uh, I mean donations surfered Tuesday #3
There is a supermax just down the road from me! niyad Tuesday #4
How'd the price go from $300 to $400m? live love laugh Tuesday #5
He puts the money in his pocket. Damn crook. Dave Bowman Tuesday #14
they underestimated the price of gold spray paint from home depot? orleans Tuesday #19
We already have a place for him in Florence, Colorado. The U.S. Super Max Prison. Botany Tuesday #6
Home sweet home in a BumRushDaShow Tuesday #7
Note the transition from "private donation" to US Taxpayer funding. Kid Berwyn Tuesday #8
He can't build without congressional approval, and I suspect ... pat_k Tuesday #22
K&R LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #9
He can have his fancy dinners at the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC FakeNoose Tuesday #11
Dont give him ideas. HubertHeaver Tuesday #18
Transport from hotels to the gilded chateau will be charged to the non billionaire taxpayers Justice matters. Tuesday #25
It should be an outdoor picnic, and let them walk to it FakeNoose Tuesday #27
I Want To See Mr.Bee Tuesday #12
THIS! calimary Wednesday #36
Trump does need to be in maximum security. dalton99a Tuesday #13
Put him in the same Traildogbob Tuesday #26
I like this one, Traildogbob! calimary Wednesday #37
First, charge that asshole with willful destruction of government property Scalded Nun Tuesday #15
N.O. Clouds Passing Tuesday #16
The Fox shock jocks have been going into overdrive justifying the bullshit ballroom. Initech Tuesday #17
Well... DET Tuesday #31
That's gross. Initech Wednesday #35
Wait a minute... quazimojo Tuesday #21
If it's a ballroom Icanthinkformyself Tuesday #23
Boy did you nail THAT one, Icanthinkformyself! calimary Wednesday #38
Talk around the table here wonders... BurnDoubt Tuesday #24
a competent FBI would go a long way samsingh Tuesday #28
You're just going for maximum recs Earl. BootinUp Tuesday #29
Earl is the leading admin of this site--- I doubt he gives a shit about personal "recs" numbers Jack Valentino Tuesday #33
Dude, the sarcasm was built in. nt BootinUp Tuesday #34
Post Removed didn't care for the thread I take it. nt BootinUp Tuesday #30
Why should US taxpayers waste money on any Secret Service detail for Trump--- ? Jack Valentino Tuesday #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pic Of The Moment: Why Sh...»Reply #20