Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(61,057 posts)
21. I doubt Maham will drop out ... Spoilers don't
Tue Apr 28, 2026, 01:44 PM
Tuesday

Given he has gotten a lot of tech money some from people also backing Hilton, his path might be could possibly become one of two Democrats. This could only happen if he surges or one or more stumble.

Then in a general election, he could get some of the independent/Democratic vote he got in the primary added to most of the Republican vote. He might be more of a threat than if a Republican was one of the choices.

Oddly, his chances of winning the general if he gets into it might not be worse than his ability to get into the top two.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

CA-GOV: New primary poll. [View all] RandySF Tuesday OP
I wonder what Villaraigosa thinks he is accomlishing. Everyone I know in LA dislikes him... PeaceWave Tuesday #1
Him dropping out would likely make it two Dems in the General FHRRK1 Tuesday #3
Porter wants it bad... can't get over that she lost her chance without video of her yelling at staff. BlueWaveNeverEnd Tuesday #8
He was awful. ..and he cheated on his wife while in office. BlueWaveNeverEnd Tuesday #6
I'm surprised he even has 4 percent. I have to think it's people that maybe don't pay much attention JI7 Tuesday #7
Knowing nothing but that and his name, could he think karynnj Tuesday #14
Xavier Becerra wanderer54 Tuesday #30
I thought I read he was attacking Bercerra karynnj Tuesday #36
Glad to see Katie down to 9%. Abolishinist Tuesday #2
Why you glad to see her drop? FHRRK1 Tuesday #4
A person who lives down the street from us was a big fundraiser for Obama. Abolishinist Tuesday #23
thanks for the feedback FHRRK1 Tuesday #25
Yikes! 😱 sheshe2 Tuesday #29
Wow. senseandsensibility Tuesday #31
She didn't call me that directly, Abolishinist Tuesday #32
So weird that she would treat a supporter at a fundraiser senseandsensibility Tuesday #33
Berating staffers. Pouring scalding hot mashed potatoes on her ex's head. This story fits with what we've heard already. PeaceWave Tuesday #34
Where have I been? senseandsensibility Tuesday #35
based on this it will be one dem and one repub in the top 2. those under 10 should drop nt msongs Tuesday #5
There's 26 percent of the people who haven't made up their mind yet . . . Journeyman Tuesday #11
I agree, especially as both are not just Republican, but karynnj Tuesday #16
I think Swalwell's problems is hurting Katie Porter in some way also JI7 Tuesday #9
Nah, Porter isn't that hugely popular in CA obamanut2012 Tuesday #20
Is there any info on the undecided numbers ? JI7 Tuesday #10
I love that Becerra is gaining pinkstarburst Tuesday #12
With 26 percent undecided and many here and elsewhere karynnj Tuesday #13
I would love to see that happen Mz Pip Tuesday #18
If the bottom four candidates would bow out now... the top two would likely be Democrats. QueerDuck Tuesday #15
Porter needs to drop out Boo1 Tuesday #17
Porter and Tech Bro Spoiler Mahan need to drop obamanut2012 Tuesday #19
I doubt Maham will drop out ... Spoilers don't karynnj Tuesday #21
It's the problem with jungle primaries. The votes get diluted...nt Wounded Bear Tuesday #22
How can there be 26% undecided? WTF? Initech Tuesday #24
Thanks for posting, RandySF Auggie Tuesday #26
26% are still undecided. WTF is wrong with them. The good new of course is that banco is in fourth now, and the lostincalifornia Tuesday #27
Hey California America voted for a person with no government experience and an out of touch rich man to be president kimbutgar Tuesday #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CA-GOV: New primary poll.»Reply #21