Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mr715

(4,775 posts)

8. Stage IV cancer is worth worrying about

Reply to OAITW r.2.0 (Original post)

Wed Jun 3, 2026, 11:14 PM

Jun 3

Yes, he had advisors and competent ministers...

But part of why he was not winning that election was because he was perceived as ill, while Trump was not. They gave Trump a pass.

Doesn't change the Stage IV cancer.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why I never worried about Biden's health. [View all] OAITW r.2.0 Jun 2 OP

Kamala.... n/t Chemical Bill Jun 3 #1

Hillary/Harris 2028. OAITW r.2.0 Jun 3 #2

That's a good way to get another Republican president iemanja Jun 3 #4

If you read The Conyers Report... Chemical Bill Jun 3 #7

And what would their campaign slogan be, "The third time's the charm"? Rob H. Jun 4 #15

Also that. nt eppur_se_muova Jun 3 #5

He listened to experts, he knew how to delegate, and he had a VP ready to step in Warpy Jun 3 #3

I didn't either. LisaL Jun 3 #6

Stage IV cancer is worth worrying about mr715 Jun 3 #8

Not So Fast DET Jun 3 #10

But the cancer was there are was real. mr715 Jun 4 #11

Yes, But DET Jun 4 #13

I was under the impression that any cancer can affect mental acuity mr715 Jun 4 #14

Beyond My Pay Grade DET Jun 4 #17

Nailed it, DET OAITW r.2.0 Jun 4 #12

Plus... Chemical Bill Jun 3 #9

I'm sorry but what good did it do? mr715 Jun 4 #16

I was explaining why I wasn't worried about President Biden. Chemical Bill Jun 4 #18

I understand, but "performing well" is poorly defined. mr715 Jun 4 #19

Have you read The Conyers Report? n/t Chemical Bill Jun 4 #21

No mr715 Jun 4 #22

Please read it before you blame any Democrat. Chemical Bill Jun 4 #23

Plus Mad_Machine76 Jun 4 #20