Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Melon

(1,866 posts)

2. Iran was violating the agreement by limiting and preventing

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Original post)

Wed Jun 17, 2026, 10:30 PM

Wednesday

Access by nuclear inspectors. This is true.

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/iran-rejects-us-demand-for-un-visit-to-military-sites-idUSKCN1B9182/

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Baitball Blogger Miami Blue Rhiannon12866

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Who understands the effectiveness of Obama's nuclear deal with Iran? [View all] Baitball Blogger Wednesday OP

They are going to explain everything regarding Miami Blue Wednesday #1

Thank you. Baitball Blogger Wednesday #4

Thanks for the heads-up. Talitha Wednesday #27

Iran was violating the agreement by limiting and preventing Melon Wednesday #2

Note the date. Aug 2017. By 2018, before US withdrawal, the IAEA was in country, inspecting, and certified compliance. RockRaven Wednesday #6

Post removed Post removed Wednesday #7

Yes there is no rewriting history. At the time Trump pulled the US out, every other party to the agreement RockRaven Wednesday #12

You are placing an ad hoc rescue that at a certain short Melon Wednesday #15

This is from the United Nations. Melon Wednesday #17

So, any explanation for why, when I go the link you provided AZJonnie Thursday #33

But, this happened during Trump's term. Baitball Blogger Wednesday #8

You are incorrect, per your own article. AloeVera Wednesday #9

In every instance, Trump has been a bull in a china shop. Baitball Blogger Wednesday #22

This is incorrect. They were not violating the agreement. tman Wednesday #16

"This is true" dpibel Wednesday #30

From the article you linked to: EarlG Wednesday #31

Try this post Johnny2X2X Wednesday #3

You interlocutor is, for lack of a better word, a liar. RockRaven Wednesday #5

You realize Wikipedia is written by...just anyone. Melon Wednesday #11

You realize those numbers are citations and you can check whether they say what the article says? RockRaven Wednesday #14

There's zero science behind it. Melon Wednesday #18

Well, you got this bit right AZJonnie Thursday #34

Seems your post was indeed prescient AZJonnie Thursday #35

Inspectors from the atomic energy agency were granted continuous lostincalifornia Wednesday #10

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Melon Wednesday #13

They were fully compliant while the JCPOA was active. tman Wednesday #20

See below. Melon Wednesday #21

That's from 12 June 2025, so my point still stands. tman Wednesday #25

What is also conveniently omitted is that inspectors were refused entry after lostincalifornia Wednesday #28

It was a starting point, and throwing that agreement out instead of using it lostincalifornia Wednesday #23

What did they expect when trump unilaterally pulled out of the agreement? lostincalifornia Wednesday #26

This is not true per the atomic energy agency and the UN.... Melon Wednesday #19

You are citing a judgment from 2025 about activity from 2019 and onward RockRaven Wednesday #24

Exactly. Trump unilaterally tore up that agreement in 2017. Why would some lostincalifornia Wednesday #29

knr ... bookmarked ... cliffside Thursday #32