General Discussion

Aviation Pro

(15,907 posts)

1. Good

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Mon Jun 29, 2026, 10:20 AM

Jun 29

Looks like even the confirmed rapist’s appointees are tired of the fuckwad’s shit.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate SheltieLover Dixc homegirl iluvtennis byronius Wednesdays skideemon

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

SCOTUS holds states can count late-arriving mail-in ballots that are postmarked on or before Election Day [View all] In It to Win It Jun 29 OP

Good Aviation Pro Jun 29 #1

WOW... Hate to say it ordinarily, but thank you Amy Coney Barrett hlthe2b Jun 29 #2

Amy Barrett has had a couple of ruling which favored The People IMHO--but admit I already forget which ones. riversedge Jun 29 #4

Maybe Trump will alienate some more women with a typical nasty comment. Would be a win for us. RoeVWade Jun 29 #7

Yes, she has come across as a bit more PatSeg Jun 29 #10

Oh, yes, T and A, as I like to call them, will ALWAYS be as extreme as possible. ShazzieB Jun 29 #44

I'll be happy with an age or health related retirement PatSeg Jun 29 #46

Age related retirement would be fine, except for one thing. ShazzieB Tuesday #48

I know, that's a terrifying thought PatSeg Tuesday #50

Absolutely. Those two would scrap elections altogether if they could. peppertree Tuesday #51

And as they've gotten older, PatSeg Tuesday #55

No doubt about it. peppertree Tuesday #57

Good old Bush the younger PatSeg Tuesday #58

Heck of a job, Georgie. peppertree Tuesday #59

With the current political climate, PatSeg Tuesday #60

Ketchup will be flying... SheltieLover Jun 29 #3

It appears that Amy Coney Barret has become the deciding vote on this Supreme Court. kentuck Jun 29 #5

Does this ruling shoot down the proposed SAVE Act... kentuck Jun 29 #6

No Sympthsical Jun 29 #8

But this is the law until Congress votes to change it? kentuck Jun 29 #12

Yes, this is law until Congress passes new law that changes it. In It to Win It Jun 29 #16

Congress can still try to change those laws. Ms. Toad Jun 29 #13

Yeah, the SAVE Act would absolutely end up in front of the Court Sympthsical Jun 29 #19

Would that require homegirl Jun 29 #20

Currently the SAVE act is being blocked by the Senate, Ms. Toad Jun 29 #26

But what about the post office refusing to mail ballots in states that don't supply dump with the voter lists CurtEastPoint Jun 29 #9

I believe this is being challenged PatSeg Jun 29 #11

Blocked by Federal Court judge last week. paleotn Jun 29 #25

AMAZING! Thanks! CurtEastPoint Jun 29 #35

WTF. This should be a fucking no brainer since the vote was cast during an election. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Jun 29 #14

Some areas keep the post office open until midnight MichMan Jun 29 #30

But now we have to hand mail to a post office employee for postmarking catrose Tuesday #53

Wow, a rare SCOTUS decision not in favor of the Murdoch Ministry Of Propaganda! What's next? Initech Jun 29 #15

A good ruling MustLoveBeagles Jun 29 #37

Well, we got to take whatever wins we can get! Initech Jun 29 #38

I'm in agreement MustLoveBeagles Jun 29 #40

I'm going to guess they pull nonsense on birthright citizenship EnergizedLib Jun 29 #17

State CAN count them or MUST count them? Blumancru Jun 29 #18

It depends on state laws MichMan Jun 29 #22

It's important that blue voters in states that DON'T allow those delivered after the election day are aware of this. RockCreek Jun 29 #47

Trump and Republicans will order post offices not to postmark mail ballots or not deliver them on time. Lonestarblue Tuesday #49

My immediate thought exactly. VTderry Tuesday #56

Just 'forget' to postmark ones in blue districts... kirby Jun 29 #21

Or someone will come up with their own copy of a postmark. MichMan Jun 29 #23

But will the post office post mark them? yellowcanine Jun 29 #24

Good malaise Jun 29 #27

Bottom line MoseShrute Jun 29 #28

This jives with contract law - postmark dates a contract bucolic_frolic Jun 29 #29

This would have been a no brainer to probably every other Supreme Court. crud Jun 29 #31

That 2000 election, popsdenver Jun 29 #41

The Extreme Court has the "shadow docket" Soul_of_Wit Jun 29 #43

Why would anyone wait until election day to use a mail in ballot? MichMan Jun 29 #32

The undersranding used to be because it would be counted and also because things change dramatically (esp in primaries) SSJVegeta Jun 29 #34

An actual example usage of "procrastinate" from Merriam-Webster.com Soul_of_Wit Jun 29 #39

Barrett has been the most democratic member of the anti-democracy court SSJVegeta Jun 29 #33

Barrett just told the GOP how to change federal law Raven123 Jun 29 #36

Just more evidence to me the Supreme Court must be expanded standingtall Jun 29 #42

Scotland ABC123Easy Jun 29 #45

They should have rejected this case to begin with. mdbl Tuesday #52

I am afraid if Trump gets total control over elections wee will have lost. Encouraging decision. Martin68 Tuesday #54