Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Four BILLION people could die by 2050 due to climate change [View all]Another Jackalope
(234 posts)15. No realistic plan in place to avoid this scenario
Sandy Trust, the lead author of the report, said there was no realistic plan in place to avoid this scenario.
He said economic predictions, which estimate that damages from global heating would be as low as 2% of global economic production for a 3C rise in global average surface temperature, were inaccurate and were blinding political leaders to the risks of their policies.
The climate risk assessments being used by financial institutions, politicians and civil servants to assess the economic effects of global heating were wrong, the report said, because they ignored the expected severe effects of climate change such as tipping points, sea temperature rises, migration and conflict as a result of global heating.
[They] do not recognise there is a risk of ruin. They are precisely wrong, rather than being roughly right, the report said.
He said economic predictions, which estimate that damages from global heating would be as low as 2% of global economic production for a 3C rise in global average surface temperature, were inaccurate and were blinding political leaders to the risks of their policies.
The climate risk assessments being used by financial institutions, politicians and civil servants to assess the economic effects of global heating were wrong, the report said, because they ignored the expected severe effects of climate change such as tipping points, sea temperature rises, migration and conflict as a result of global heating.
[They] do not recognise there is a risk of ruin. They are precisely wrong, rather than being roughly right, the report said.
There has never been a realistic plan to avoid this scenario. All talk otherwise is simply whistling past the graveyard. Don't look up.
Estamos tan jodidos.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Blue Whale very well might go extinct because their food called krill needs cold water and the
Botany
Tuesday
#1
We are lousy stewards of this planet. Unfortunately a lot of those who are responsible will not be here
OGBuzz
Tuesday
#3
Given the current death rate, only 1.5 billion would die of natural causes.
Another Jackalope
Tuesday
#14
Fair enough. I have no problem with an estimate of 4 billion deaths by then
Another Jackalope
Tuesday
#34