General Discussion

AloeVera

(4,790 posts)

20. Why would they take rhe death rate into account when calculating

Tue Jul 7, 2026, 04:39 PM

Tuesday

...the impact of climate change?

No, the 4 billion is strictly the impact imo.

I think about the sweet little 4-year old in my family and I just want to cry. The world we are leaving him won't be interesting, it will be unbearably horrifying and sad. Imo.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OGBuzz

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Four BILLION people could die by 2050 due to climate change [View all] SamuelTheThird Tuesday OP

The Blue Whale very well might go extinct because their food called krill needs cold water and the Botany Tuesday #1

+1 dalton99a Tuesday #7

In 1856 and in Germany in 1862 Botany Tuesday #9

thats why i keep supplies in my attic. rampartd Tuesday #11

Most of the human population lives on coast lines orthoclad Tuesday #30

Maybe the problem will go away if we ignore it harder? -misanthroptimist Tuesday #2

Its more likely the problem will be self-correcting.. Volaris Tuesday #4

We are lousy stewards of this planet. Unfortunately a lot of those who are responsible will not be here OGBuzz Tuesday #3

More like canetoad Tuesday #17

Mother nature will take care of the problem eventually. OGBuzz Tuesday #35

I fear the world will respond with authoritarianism Johnny2X2X Tuesday #5

Hunger is a powerful motivator. OGBuzz Tuesday #36

History shows that is highly likely misanthrope Tuesday #45

It is the natural consequence of how we treat our planet. The GPV Tuesday #6

What can you expect from a species Stacey Grove Tuesday #8

4 billion people could die by 2050 due to old age. rampartd Tuesday #10

Pretty sure they weren't talking about deaths from old age. AloeVera Tuesday #12

Given the current death rate, only 1.5 billion would die of natural causes. Another Jackalope Tuesday #14

Why would they take rhe death rate into account when calculating AloeVera Tuesday #20

Fair enough. I have no problem with an estimate of 4 billion deaths by then Another Jackalope Tuesday #34

You know who I bet won't be one of the 4 billion? BannonsLiver Tuesday #13

Probably right SamuelTheThird Tuesday #16

Awww there there. BannonsLiver Tuesday #19

Youre kicking the thread, so good SamuelTheThird Tuesday #21

Post removed Post removed Tuesday #22

Speaking of SamuelTheThird Tuesday #23

That's cool. When do you think Taylor will release a new album? BannonsLiver Tuesday #24

When do you think people wil stop worshipping billionaires? SamuelTheThird Tuesday #25

Two weeks? BannonsLiver Tuesday #26

Have Travis and she considering having kids? mr715 Tuesday #28

No realistic plan in place to avoid this scenario Another Jackalope Tuesday #15

That's a shame. n/t flvegan Tuesday #18

I was born in 1947 PCB66 Tuesday #27

Climate change is solvable. mr715 Tuesday #29

We control nature??? SamuelTheThird Tuesday #31

I don't particularly like the idea of orbital mirrors mr715 Tuesday #32

It's a global issue TheProle Tuesday #33

Historically USA is the worst polluter in human history. nt miyazaki Tuesday #37

That is true, but mostly useful for finger-pointing (have at it) TheProle Tuesday #38

Per capita isn't any prettier, along with being the second worse polluter atm. miyazaki Tuesday #39

What I did was point out current conditions TheProle Tuesday #40

US has been then greatest polluter for 80% of the last century. miyazaki Tuesday #41

They'll have to do a great deal more to have an impact Kaleva Tuesday #44

By 2100 half the population will be dead and the survivors speaking Chinese. miyazaki Tuesday #46

China produces about as much greenhouse gases Kaleva Tuesday #43

Ask them if they care. They do, but they'll just point at whats already miyazaki Tuesday #47

The planet won't miss them... WarGamer Tuesday #42