Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(11,037 posts)
23. {sigh} This is so ridiculous. The status quo FAVORS DEMOCRATS not Republicans.
Thu Jul 9, 2026, 12:08 PM
14 hrs ago

A special election almost certainly would benefit Republicans, NOT Democrats.

The current situation is VERY BAD for Republicans and a GREAT SITUATION for Democrats. Democrats are the ones who should not want a special election. Republicans should want McConnell gone ASAP. An incapacitated McConnell means Republicans have only 52 votes in the Senate instead of 53. With only 52 votes, now only 3 Republicans need to vote with Democrats to kill any legislation or nominees. For example, Democrats now need only 3 Republicans to vote against Blanche as AG to kill his nomination. With McConnell present or another Republican elected in a special election taking his place, Democrats would need 4 Republican votes to kill Blanche's nomination.

Even if a Democrat won a special election it would at most be minimally worse for Republicans than a vacant seat or an incapacitated McConnell. Having a Democrat in that seat only really helps Democrats during votes where one or more Republicans are absent. Whether it's 52-47 or 52-48, Democrats still need 3 Republican votes in the senate to kill Republican legislation or nominees. A special election which would almost certainly be won by a Republican, would give Republicans back that 53rd vote for several months.

Worst case for Republicans with Special election, Democrats win but it has no real effect on Senate votes. However, if a Republican wins a special election , they get their 53rd vote back which is extremely significant.

A 53rd Republican in the Senate is an enormous advantage for Republicans (4 Republicans would need to join Democrats to kill legislation or nominees instead of the current 3 with McConnell not present), while a 48th Democrat effectively doesn't help Democrats at all (Democrats would still need 3 Republican votes to kill legislation or nominees - just like now).

Why is this so hard for so many to understand?

BTW, Andy Barr, the Republican candidate for the seat in Novembers general election is considered to have over a 99% likelihood of winning the seat. The chance of a Democrat winning a special election is only a tiny bit better. Before you say "but Kentucky has a Democratic Governor", Kentucky last elected a Democratic Senator in 1992. On the other hand, Kentucky has had only 2 Republican Governors (both for a single term) in the past 55 years. A Democrat winning the Governership in Kentucky is routine, having happened in 12 of the last 14 elections. Republicans have won 10 straight Senate elections.

https://www.racetothewh.com/senate/26#google_vignette

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

privacy, hipaa laws Quiet Em 15 hrs ago #1
HIPAA laws?? moose65 15 hrs ago #9
I know, I said privacy too Quiet Em 15 hrs ago #10
They have admitted he is in the hospital. DO what kidnapping experts do: ask for a photograph of him in his bed ... usaf-vet 14 hrs ago #24
If an elected official is permanently unable to perform their duty Orrex 14 hrs ago #26
Meh, McConnell's health is a distraction from the important stuff muriel_volestrangler 15 hrs ago #2
Even More Strange and Odd ahnakneemoose 15 hrs ago #3
My guess is they know everything we know, karynnj 15 hrs ago #5
It's generally a waste of time. Renew Deal 15 hrs ago #4
Why would Republicans do if Mitch was a Democrat? Chasstev365 15 hrs ago #6
Don't know and don't really care what they would do Renew Deal 15 hrs ago #7
Exactly. Wednesdays 15 hrs ago #8
Feinstein recently died in office after a long decline. tritsofme 15 hrs ago #13
Did you mean "weren't"? Totally Tunsie 15 hrs ago #11
really? paulk 15 hrs ago #12
Bookmarking. betsuni 15 hrs ago #14
Probably because Boo1 14 hrs ago #15
WERE demanding? maxsolomon 14 hrs ago #16
Mitch could end the speculation Mz Pip 14 hrs ago #17
If he's really on life support, what do Republicans gain by keeping Mitch's condition secret? I don't see the benefit. sop 14 hrs ago #18
They dont. Wiz Imp 14 hrs ago #22
You're not going to get much out of a staffer. WhiskeyGrinder 14 hrs ago #19
Where's Chuck Schumer? MadMike47 14 hrs ago #20
Where is Chuck Schumer MadMike47 14 hrs ago #21
{sigh} This is so ridiculous. The status quo FAVORS DEMOCRATS not Republicans. Wiz Imp 14 hrs ago #23
Are you a constituent of McConnell? Progressive dog 14 hrs ago #25
It is sad to see Democratic leadership get criticized over something the Republicans are the ones... Ol Janx Spirit 14 hrs ago #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #23