General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's OK to be an atheist [View all]hifiguy
(33,688 posts)proponent of an idea or position present sufficient evidence to support their case in order to win. That has been a rule of rhetoric ever since the age of the Greeks. The proponent of an idea ALWAYS has the burden of PROOF. And "Because" or any of its infinite variations does NOT constitute evidence of anything other than what is in that person's head. Which is NOT extrinsic evidence.
Atheists are merely applying reason and logic. If a phenomenon exists, it necessarily must manifest itself in some observable way or it can be deemed not to exist. You might want to read a book by theoretical physicist Victor Stenger, "God - The Failed Hypothesis" in which he adds a variety of scientific disproofs to the strictly logical ones offered by everyone from Daniel Dennett to Christopher Hitchens.
"I'd rather know than believe." - Carl Sagan
"That which is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence." - Christopher Hitchens