Announcements
In reply to the discussion: We have made an adjustment to DU's "No bigotry/insensitivity" rule: please read [View all]LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)
When highlighting bigoted comments by a public figure, members should take care to avoid the impression that they agree with those comments.
A lot of people post Twitter posts of public figures saying bigoted things or anything crazy without adding any comment. Does this mean that sort of non-comment is not allowed when posting something a public figure said if it was transphobic? As in, no comment means the poster agrees with the statement and therefore deserves a hide?
Could you explain that part a little better? Like if one posts a racist Twitter post from Tucker Carlson without adding a comment, does that get removed for being assumed to agree with it? Or will that just be something for transphobic statements. As in the poster needs to say something positive about the transgender community in their OP comments to assure those reading that they do not agree with the said quote?
It seems very broad so I just want to pinpoint what you are asking for that one part. Everything else is clear.