(I get tired of pointing out that the FOMC committee makes the rate decision in a vote, it's not the nefarious Jerome who alone decides; but I realize the smartest people in the room types will point out that they're all part of the Trump-loving tax-cut-wishing oligarchy, sigh. Sometimes I just need to take time off)
I think people forget that decision is done by a Committee, including a "Board" with several Biden appointees on it. I sort of liken it to how some think that John Roberts can swoop in and unilaterally override any SCOTUS decision.
I put little weight on the argument that they won't do 0.50% because it might scare the markets and scare consumers and business leaders too.
Actually I wasn't thinking of the amount as something that would "scare the markets" but more along the lines of the opposite, where it could unintentionally juice them, as there are some (speculators) in the markets who seem to want to use these sorts of interest rate cut announcements as a Red Bull-type stimulant. I say this because of watching what happened in the past whenever there were "rumors" floated about "cuts" (like this past late winter/early spring), leading to the markets shooting up.
It's a tricky thing to be able to try to reduce the volatility that often occurs whenever there are simple policy discussions.
I am always amazed, always, at how much good people around these parts seem to think a 0.25% cut will do. Really, they think 0.25% is going to propel a pre-election nirvana of renewed economic and job growth? As opposed to what I think -- it will propel the stock market up for a couple of days.
I actually think it will generate the same type of reaction when the hikes finally stopped (despite the predictions that "'Powell' (in quotes) would keep raising the rates more and more and more and we would end up back in the late '70s in a Volker redux).