Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump hush money sentencing delayed until after election [View all]BumRushDaShow
(141,315 posts)76. Today is September 7, 2024
Bragg was sworn into office a little over 32 months ago. Right now, when it comes to criminal cases (whether state or federal), his is the ONLY one that has gone from start to finish with convictions.
ABC News did a timeline - https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/timeline-manhattan-district-attorney-case-donald-trump/story?id=98389444
(snip)
Jan. 1, 2022
Bragg takes office as Manhattan's new district attorney. Before leaving office, Vance does not bring charges against Trump.
Feb. 22, 2022
The two prosecutors leading the Trump probe -- Assistant District Attorneys Carey Dunne and Mark Pomerantz -- resign from the district attorney's office.
Pomerantz later reveals that he disagreed with Bragg's decision to not bring charges against Trump in Bragg's early days as DA. Pomerantz was formerly a special prosecutor with the Southern District of New York.
The investigation continues after their resignations but doubt is cast on whether charges will be brought against Trump.
(snip)
Dec. 5, 2022
Bragg announces he has hired Matthew Colangelo as senior counsel. He was a previous Department of Justice official and prior to that worked at the New York Attorney General's Office where he was part of the team that investigated the Trump Foundation.
(snip)
May 24, 2023
Judge Merchan sets a trial date of March 25, 2024, for Trump's criminal trial on charges of falsifying business records. He had previously indicated that no one associated with the case is allowed to schedule anything that would conflict with the trial.
The judge also reviews for Trump the terms of the protective order that prohibits him from sharing on social media any evidence turned over by the Manhattan district attorney during discovery.
(snip)
Jan. 1, 2022
Bragg takes office as Manhattan's new district attorney. Before leaving office, Vance does not bring charges against Trump.
Feb. 22, 2022
The two prosecutors leading the Trump probe -- Assistant District Attorneys Carey Dunne and Mark Pomerantz -- resign from the district attorney's office.
Pomerantz later reveals that he disagreed with Bragg's decision to not bring charges against Trump in Bragg's early days as DA. Pomerantz was formerly a special prosecutor with the Southern District of New York.
The investigation continues after their resignations but doubt is cast on whether charges will be brought against Trump.
(snip)
Dec. 5, 2022
Bragg announces he has hired Matthew Colangelo as senior counsel. He was a previous Department of Justice official and prior to that worked at the New York Attorney General's Office where he was part of the team that investigated the Trump Foundation.
(snip)
May 24, 2023
Judge Merchan sets a trial date of March 25, 2024, for Trump's criminal trial on charges of falsifying business records. He had previously indicated that no one associated with the case is allowed to schedule anything that would conflict with the trial.
The judge also reviews for Trump the terms of the protective order that prohibits him from sharing on social media any evidence turned over by the Manhattan district attorney during discovery.
(snip)
Again I ask, why did Vance WAIT until right before he was going to leave office to suddenly decide to start an investigation and instead DUMPS the case on a brand new D.A?
The state and city of NY have had a lot of issues over the decades and have let 45 slide for 50 years before finally doing something. He was apparently "good P.R. for the city and state".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am not surprised but a little pisssed. Politics should have no relation to the judicial.
Bev54
Sep 6
#55
"Bragg could have moved forward long before election season. He has a history of reluctance."
BumRushDaShow
Sep 7
#73
The prosecution didn't oppose it, and the reasoning in the judge's letter makes sense.
Ocelot II
Sep 6
#10
He's still *convicted.* The rescheduling of the sentencing hearing doesn't change that.
Ocelot II
Sep 6
#22
There is one other step required before he is *convicted.* The trial judge has to enter the verdict and that typically
24601
Sep 6
#39
Deviating from a normal course of events to avoid the appearance of being political
RockRaven
Sep 6
#33
I don't see anything wrong with a law, abiding citizen, gaining advantage in an election, because their opponent is a fe
Walleye
Sep 6
#37
Could you imagine if the prosecution had opposed the delay?? #Trump and MAGA fans
riversedge
Sep 6
#58
..."he wants to avoid the unwarranted perception of a political motive."
republianmushroom
Sep 6
#66