Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: North Carolina removes 747,000 from voter rolls, citing ineligibility [View all]BumRushDaShow
(146,798 posts)32. There is a lot of discussion in this thread denigrating people who are questioning purges
I would assume that given NC has a Democratic governor, their election operation is on the up-and-up because the NC SOS is a Democrat.
However the GOP is attempting to force a further purge for bullshit reasons and I linked to that. If the courts agree with the RNC (even with the Appeals Court being a 9(D) - 6(R)), then guess what?
(I.e., we need to be "aware" of what the GOP intends to do this cycle)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
North Carolina removes 747,000 from voter rolls, citing ineligibility [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Sep 2024
OP
Dead people yes but removing people because they haven't voted in the last two Fed elections?
Bengus81
Sep 2024
#26
The elections boards send out update cards to every registered voter.
littlemissmartypants
Sep 2024
#27
Are you sure you wanted to post this here? I think I shared this with you the other day.
littlemissmartypants
Sep 2024
#31
There is a lot of discussion in this thread denigrating people who are questioning purges
BumRushDaShow
Sep 2024
#32
"if the is attempting to sneak in some shady stuff (in addition) - then by all means give em' hell on those measures."
BumRushDaShow
Sep 2024
#39
Will those voters who moved, or who are inactive, be able to vote provisionally?
Oopsie Daisy
Sep 2024
#29
Yes, that's what I assumed would be the case. --- They can vote provisionally and their ballot *
Oopsie Daisy
Sep 2024
#37
Hopefully Anderson Clayton's team has registered lots of 18 year olds. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Sep 2024
#5
Thats NOT what it means and please stop spreading bad information. TY!
littlemissmartypants
Sep 2024
#11
It didn't just happen "close to the election" -- its the number removed over the past 20 months.
onenote
Sep 2024
#14
"There was a CT for a while that provisional ballots were always tossed."
BumRushDaShow
Sep 2024
#35
747,000 over 20 months. My math skills aren't great but I think that's around 37,350/month or less than 1/2 of 1 percent
onenote
Sep 2024
#15