Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(147,160 posts)
2. "I just hope our side has a plan to counteract their unconstitutional rulings."
Wed Oct 30, 2024, 09:30 AM
Oct 2024

The only way to "counteract" those rulings is to keep the Presidency and the Senate, and take back the House. Then we can start implementing SCOTUS ethics reforms that have bills already drafted, among other things.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They are going to cheat for him. BlueKota Oct 2024 #1
"I just hope our side has a plan to counteract their unconstitutional rulings." BumRushDaShow Oct 2024 #2
I realize we have to do everything we can to get BlueKota Oct 2024 #8
The SCOTUS generally upholds "states rights" which is a provision in the Constitution BumRushDaShow Oct 2024 #15
So they were purged on day 90? LeftInTX Oct 2024 #41
SCOTUSBlog has a better description of what was going on - BumRushDaShow Oct 2024 #46
umm.Thanks for post. riversedge Oct 2024 #64
Can valid voters appeal their removal? no_hypocrisy Oct 2024 #3
Sort of MissMillie Oct 2024 #27
Yes they can thatdemguy Oct 2024 #35
In other words they need to re-register to vote on Election Day FakeNoose Oct 2024 #65
WTF. What happened to States control elections. We are 6 days away from the general election, and the thugs on the JohnSJ Oct 2024 #4
The case turned the interpretation and application of a federal law governing removal ofnames from a state's voter rolls onenote Oct 2024 #18
I think you are giving this court the benefit of doubt. I will be JohnSJ Oct 2024 #32
I said the Supreme Court's decision was indefensible. In what universe is that giving them the benefit of the doubt? onenote Oct 2024 #44
Yes I did read it onenote, perhaps incorrectly, but based on the view that the court was properly brought into the case JohnSJ Oct 2024 #47
They haven't "heard" the case yet. They've decided an emergency motion. onenote Oct 2024 #49
Thanks. I don't think there is anyway the case will be heard before the election, and the only remedy for those purged JohnSJ Oct 2024 #52
Correct. Which is one of several reasons it is an indefensible order. onenote Oct 2024 #57
Thanks. Now I have a complete picture. JohnSJ Oct 2024 #69
In many cases, the people being potentially removed indicated themselves they were not citizens MichMan Oct 2024 #58
Then it isn't as straightforward as some of the OPs suggest. JohnSJ Oct 2024 #70
It is no longer a stay, they are allowing the purge to continue. JohnSJ Oct 2024 #39
It is a stay of the injunction ordered by the lower courts. onenote Oct 2024 #45
Thanks. Appreciate the edification. JohnSJ Oct 2024 #48
Not just men BlueKota Oct 2024 #34
true, though her reasoning I think might be different than the men on that court. JohnSJ Oct 2024 #38
Supreme Court allows Virginia to resume its purge of voter registrations mahatmakanejeeves Oct 2024 #5
While this isn't positive ScratchCat Oct 2024 #6
So what's to stop them from doing 50K more tomorrow? IrishAfricanAmerican Oct 2024 #42
Why didn't they do 50,000 before the ruling? onenote Oct 2024 #50
Maybe they were testing the fences? IrishAfricanAmerican Oct 2024 #68
These people weren't voting anyway at least the ones who stayed they couldn't vote underpants Oct 2024 #60
It is time now to ignore the extreme six's illegal rulings. Clouds Passing Oct 2024 #7
Who is going to ignore this ruling? The Virginia authorities that requested the ruling? onenote Oct 2024 #51
I know they did, but I'm just sayin' I'm tired of their unlawful rulings. Clouds Passing Oct 2024 #73
The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from Wednesday's action. Dumpy Oct 2024 #9
The only one old enough to consider retiring would be Thomas. oldsoftie Oct 2024 #55
Expected FredGarvin Oct 2024 #10
I don't trust they will allow a legitimate Harris win BlueKota Oct 2024 #12
They have a major incentive to let Trump win Danascot Oct 2024 #67
The order says all so called non citizens. So bluestarone Oct 2024 #11
Good point. Maybe the order is more limited than the headline? nt wiggs Oct 2024 #17
I guess IF i were from there and knew i was removed bluestarone Oct 2024 #19
What can we do??? HagathaCrispy Oct 2024 #13
Take a little solace in knowing MissMillie Oct 2024 #25
These fuckers WILL install TFG bluestarone Oct 2024 #14
I do to. BlueKota Oct 2024 #20
Well, i still have some faith in our DU members that insist that it would be hard for THIS SC, IF bluestarone Oct 2024 #21
There will be civil war if that happens HagathaCrispy Oct 2024 #16
No. PSPS Oct 2024 #56
What's the solution then BlueKota Oct 2024 #72
Link to the Order: Ramsey Barner Oct 2024 #22
Oh there is discussion alright. Just not with the people they are supposed to be discussing. It's called the fix. Hassin Bin Sober Oct 2024 #40
harris is going to win et tu Oct 2024 #23
I also think Harris will win. BlueKota Oct 2024 #26
60 cases were heard following the last election. 59 were wins for the Dems. It was the same court we have now PortTack Oct 2024 #33
Was Barrett involved in rejecting Trumps objections BlueKota Oct 2024 #36
National Voter Registration Act SpankMe Oct 2024 #24
roughly 2/3 of Alabama's illegal purge MissMillie Oct 2024 #28
The Supreme Court MAY need protection! 3825-87867 Oct 2024 #29
Why do they have to be removed now, today? LittleGirl Oct 2024 #30
So, instead of determining if they are ineligible now, it would be better to let them vote and then throw them in jail ? MichMan Oct 2024 #59
So out of 144ish million voters LittleGirl Oct 2024 #71
Please explain how the checks and balances worked in the case I linked to? MichMan Oct 2024 #75
Virginia has same day voter registration idahoblue Oct 2024 #31
I was BRUTALLY HARASSED on another thread for asking the same questions asked here!!!! HagathaCrispy Oct 2024 #37
You don't say! jfz9580m Oct 2024 #77
SCOTUS actively supporting MAGA HereForTheParty Oct 2024 #43
Fascist Shits Through And Through... MayReasonRule Oct 2024 #53
Mark Elias can't fix this. gab13by13 Oct 2024 #54
How does this affect us? Groundhawg Oct 2024 #61
When the house reconvenes 1 Nov Farmer-Rick Oct 2024 #62
@JoyceWhiteVance In a disgraceful departure from the so-called Purcell principle which SCOTUS uses to reject changes riversedge Oct 2024 #63
Question: Will we be able to learn the detailed results of this purging? Gender, Party, precincts, ethnicity, Jit423 Oct 2024 #66
It was youngkin demagogue to get attention with no basis by executive order to illegally purge 1600 Virgina voters. JohnSJ Oct 2024 #74
If virginia has same day voter registration i dont see jow this is the biggest deal in practice ColinC Oct 2024 #76
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court clears way ...»Reply #2