Latest Breaking News

Last edited Fri Jan 3, 2025, 09:56 AM - Edit history (1)

For the header, no. And don't conflate it with the rest of what you are talking about.

"Good enough" and "functional" are obviously not synonymous, since "good enough" is subjective and "functional" is descriptive. And you falsely claimed the hospital to be non-functional, quite different from passing a judgement of "not good enough", which, being subjective, is disputable as well. So if you can't stick with what you said earlier, don't blame anyone for it but yourself.

WHO, according to you, claimed fire being set in the hospital and naked people being marched south. It was on them, not COGAT, to substantiate their claims. They didn't. It was on you to substantiate their claims before you amplified them in your post. You didn't. You took these claims for granted, as God's honest truth, based entirely on nothing but rumors that were at the core of WHO's claims. No one other than those who spread rumors is obligated to reveal anything. So don't deflect on COGAT what is on you to fact check. And don't presume anyone not revealing something that you take for granted without proof is an excuse for your failure.

And with all due deference for your love of dogs, you don't seem to know anything about how military service dogs are trained and how their handlers are trained. Military service dogs are not domestic pooches, they are lethal weapons, and their handlers are not just dog lovers, they are highly trained and responsible in using their dogs as such in all situations. You are not in a position to pass generic judgements on either. Don't presume fault where there is none.