Latest Breaking News

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)

20. Easy for you to say someone should risk years in federal penitentiary because you can't wait a brief time. . . nt

Reply to Think. Again. (Reply #16)

Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:38 AM

Jan 2025

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ancianita

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice Department says it plans to release only part of special counsel's Trump report for now [View all] BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 OP

Goddamn it, Garland. Release the whole fucking report. dalton99a Jan 2025 #1

There is a court order holding back the second volume. That it is bogus doesn't mean it must not be respected Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #3

Why should claudette Jan 2025 #8

Because it is a court order. People like Giuliani don't respect them, but law abiding citizens do Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #12

Exactly Unladen Swallow Jan 2025 #27

That's the problem, Democrats obey the rules and then take it up the nose when the pukes don't. dem4decades Jan 2025 #54

Too late.! By the time "a court" reverses it... Grins Jan 2025 #61

But if the claudette Jan 2025 #29

The order is not fake or counterfeit. It is based on bogus reasoning (in my view) & I think it will be overruled Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #30

Because it is a court order endgenocide Jan 2025 #32

Have you looked at the updated AP article in OP? BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #33

In simpler terms DENVERPOPS Jan 2025 #66

Because prison time is unappealing? FBaggins Jan 2025 #36

Respected ? Why kacekwl Jan 2025 #34

Easy for you to ask someone to take the federal penitentiary chip for your impatience Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #35

Biden can release the report anytime SurfLiberal Jan 2025 #38

Certainly it is a matter kacekwl Jan 2025 #45

Can't let the poors know the lies & corruption they live under NotHardly Jan 2025 #57

He'll need to ponder that... Gnomad Jan 2025 #59

Garland is SPINELESS Owens Jan 2025 #2

The second volume release is out of his hands for a few days at least Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #5

"..safeguarding defendants' interest..." DV1 Jan 2025 #4

On one hand we have someone who tried to end democracy. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2025 #48

No evidence is being thrown out. thesquanderer Jan 2025 #65

That's a shame claudette Jan 2025 #6

It is the Injustice Dept. Irish_Dem Jan 2025 #7

I shudder to think what Gym-Rat Jordan will do with it..... lastlib Jan 2025 #9

Gym Jordan is in the House, this will be released to Senate Judiciary Gnomad Jan 2025 #49

aw sh*t, forgot about new Congress..... lastlib Jan 2025 #60

My bad... Gnomad Jan 2025 #62

Garland is a shit. .... covering up Trump's crimes just like Bill Barr. Botany Jan 2025 #10

This is an Ellsberg moment. FalloutShelter Jan 2025 #11

Wait a few days. Fair chance the 11th Circuit will overrule Cannon, again. They might even reinstate the case. . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #14

That would be great. FalloutShelter Jan 2025 #15

No, waiting has been our mistake all along. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #16

Easy for you to say someone should risk years in federal penitentiary because you can't wait a brief time. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #20

I have no idea what you're talking about. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #22

Leaking documents can be a Federal crime. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #23

That's weird, I didn't say anything about leaking documents. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #24

Daniel Ellsberg is topic of this subthread, which is what was in mind. He was charged w 115 years, but not convicted. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #25

cool, I was responding to your suggestion we continue waiting to act. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #26

EXACTLY! Cannon's dismissal of the case might still be overturned, sending the case back into court Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #40

There are two Cannon items in front of the 11th now Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #43

Dont put it past him... Gnomad Jan 2025 #63

Jack Smith could've gotten her fired, too bad, so sad, he's resigning Gnomad Jan 2025 #58

Splitting the baby C_U_L8R Jan 2025 #13

NOTE THE UPDATE: THE CLASSIFIED STUFF IS GOING TO BE RELEASED TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LEADERS BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #17

Never to be seen by us. Boomerproud Jan 2025 #47

Do you have security clearance to review "classified documents" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #51

So everything outside of the corrupt Judge Cannon's case is to be released. Mister Ed Jan 2025 #18

Part of the stuff supposedly "blocked" by her will be released to the Chair/Ranking Members of the Judiciary Committee BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #31

At this stage of the game, knowing Garland, gab13by13 Jan 2025 #19

The Just Us department. Looking out for what's best for trump. Autumn Jan 2025 #21

Does this surprise anybody? NT Firestorm49 Jan 2025 #28

Nope. orangecrush Jan 2025 #55

Likely to protect ongoing and future cases. Joinfortmill Jan 2025 #37

Merrick the Meek, must protect the convicted felon and not look "political". republianmushroom Jan 2025 #39

Merrick Garland is the worst AG in American history. lark Jan 2025 #41

Release it all now kimbutgar Jan 2025 #42

Nothing released yet in the Justice Dept Special Counsel portal. C0RI0LANUS Jan 2025 #44

Are they gonna release it or waste time advertising they're gonna release it? Deuxcents Jan 2025 #46

Translation: AverageOldGuy Jan 2025 #50

Adverbs, prepositions and conjuntives only Bobstandard Jan 2025 #52

I'm sure that the Republican ranking members Mblaze Jan 2025 #53

Shocked. Shocked, I tell you. Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #56

The election interference case is Deminpenn Jan 2025 #64

How typical. n/t malthaussen Jan 2025 #67

Who's a weasel............ LPBBEAR Jan 2025 #68