Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Kim Davis pleads with appeals court to let her off the hook for $100,000 owed to same-sex couple she denied a marriage [View all]riversedge
(74,162 posts)36. I had forgotten that Clarence Thomas left the right to 'interracial marriage"!! Thanks for the reminder.
............
So what's to stop another court from going after other unenumerated rights by employing the same legal framework that was used to overturn Roe v. Wade?
Justice Samuel Alito for one tries to allay that concern in the lead Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization opinion, taking care to distinguish abortion from other rights, only to have Justice Clarence Thomas pull the rug out.
In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Courts substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell, Thomas wrote in concurrence. Because any substantive due process decision is demonstrably erroneous, we have a duty to correct the error established in those precedents.
For court watchers, almost as notable as the hit list of cases the conservative justice explicitly names was the one he left out. Loving v. Virginia which in 1967 established a right to interracial marriage was cited by every other opinion in the Dobbs case when discussing substantive due process
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Kim Davis pleads with appeals court to let her off the hook for $100,000 owed to same-sex couple she denied a marriage [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jan 31
OP
You're right. And I learned from the show "Bob hearts Abishola" that no where in the bible does it say anything
Maraya1969
Jan 31
#10
Bigoted assholes who think that Jesus will give 'em an extra comfy couch in heaven if they
Botany
Jan 31
#12
My thought, too. Just how long do these people have to wait for court ordered restitution?
Deuxcents
Jan 31
#26
September 2015: The Kim Davis Saga May Last Until At Least January, If Not Longer
mahatmakanejeeves
Jan 31
#18
I think she is just grifting. She hopes someone with money will hear her plea and give her the money.
usaf-vet
Jan 31
#21
Don't laugh too soon, guys. Clarence Thomas mentioned Obergefell in his concurrence with Dobbs...
Hekate
Jan 31
#25
My jaw dropped when I saw this post--there is the big R for Religion in it and do believe she
riversedge
Jan 31
#32
When Dobbs was passed, I cried for 3 days. But when I *read* Dobbs, I went ballistic...
Hekate
Jan 31
#33
I had forgotten that Clarence Thomas left the right to 'interracial marriage"!! Thanks for the reminder.
riversedge
Jan 31
#36
I will never forget what she looked like then. I will avoid ever seeing her again. My EYES.......
twodogsbarking
Jan 31
#31
Sell you house Kimmy.................how about forfeiting your pension.............
turbinetree
Jan 31
#35