Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(147,532 posts)
7. Oh I know
Sun Feb 23, 2025, 03:38 PM
10 hrs ago

I thankfully didn't have to do that but earlier in my career who spent a year documenting a former coworker of mine who needed to be gone (I was the Union Steward at the time so was being kept apprised).

When the deed was finally done in this guy's case, he started stalking the supervisor and some of the employees.

People don't get that within the federal government, there is an "escalation" of actions that the supervisor must go through before going with anything draconian. E.g., "verbal warning", then "written warning", then maybe a "written warning with counseling", "administrative leave", "suspension", etc.

The troubling thing that has come out recently with these "firings" has been some agencies lumping recently promoted career employees with career-conditional ones, and treating them identically to new hires being "on probation". googly:

It just gets worse and worse.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Agencies seek guidance on...»Reply #7