Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(166,651 posts)
Tue Apr 8, 2025, 11:10 AM Apr 2025

US Supreme Court halts reinstatement of fired federal employees [View all]

Source: Reuters

April 8, 2025 12:48 PM EDT Updated 20 min ago


April 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court blocked on Tuesday a judge's order for President Donald Trump's administration to rehire thousands of fired employees, acting in a dispute over his effort to slash the federal workforce and dismantle parts of the government.

The court put on hold San Francisco-based U.S. Judge William Alsup's March 13 injunction requiring six federal agencies to reinstate thousands of recently hired probationary employees while litigation challenging the legality of the dismissals continues.

The court in a brief, unsigned order said the nine non-profit organizations who were granted an injunction in response to their lawsuit lacked the legal standing to sue. The court said that its order did not address claims by other plaintiffs in the case, "which did not form the basis of the district court's preliminary injunction." Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson publicly dissented from the decision.

Alsup's ruling applied to probationary employees at the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy, Department of Interior and the Treasury Department. In a separate case, a federal judge in Baltimore also ordered the administration to reinstate thousands of fired probationary workers at 18 federal agencies in 19 mostly Democratic-led states and Washington, D.C., which had sued over the mass firings.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-halts-reinstatement-fired-federal-employees-2025-04-08/



As a note - there are a pile of cases dealing with the re-hiring of federal employees and this appears to deal with this one case by this particular group of plaintiffs (lack of standing).

Article updated.

Original article -

April 8, 2025 12:03 PM EDT Updated 5 min ago


April 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court blocked on Tuesday a judge's order for President Donald Trump's administration to rehire thousands of fired employees, acting in a dispute over his effort to slash the federal workforce and dismantle parts of the government.

The court put on hold San Francisco-based U.S. Judge William Alsup's March 13 injunction requiring six federal agencies to reinstate thousands of recently hired probationary employees while litigation challenging the legality of the dismissals continues.

The court in a brief, unsigned order said the nine non-profit organizations who were granted an injunction in response to their lawsuit lacked the legal standing to sue. The court said that its order did not address claims by other plaintiffs.

Alsup's ruling applied to probationary employees at the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Agriculture, Department of Energy, Department of Interior and the Treasury Department.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Of course they did. This court will protect Trump AT. ALL. COSTS. nt CousinIT Apr 2025 #1
Gosh, and all these people have been chastizing me Miguelito Loveless Apr 2025 #2
There are a bunch of cases related to this same issue by different groups BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #4
SCOTUS shits on the US again angrychair Apr 2025 #3
I think the later suits have featured "individuals" along with various organizations BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #6
to fix this country, there is a list of things that are needed lapfog_1 Apr 2025 #5
Maybe judges should be appointed by someone other than the president FirstLight Apr 2025 #12
I have been thinking this for a long time. BlueKota Apr 2025 #15
If we just eliminated the electoral college and apportioned senators by population, Mysterian Apr 2025 #13
that would certainly help lapfog_1 Apr 2025 #17
How can anyone say that our judiciary is "holding" when litigation that reaches the USSC in2herbs Apr 2025 #7
WE ARE ALL SCREWED vapor2 Apr 2025 #8
Bottom line this SC will not allow our democracy to survive. bluestarone Apr 2025 #9
I agree with the above comments, but isn't this a commonly used loophole? TheRickles Apr 2025 #10
This is NOT the end-because another judge has issued a more sweeping order in a lawsuit brought by the states LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #11
In tsf first term I emailed my college history professor BlueKota Apr 2025 #14
This needs to be repeated far, wide, and non-stop... Scalded Nun Apr 2025 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Supreme Court halts re...