Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

cadoman

(1,617 posts)

34. not that politics should come into play when prosecuting a child molestation ring...

Reply to doc03 (Reply #31)

Thu Jul 24, 2025, 09:50 AM

Jul 2025

...but I'm quite certain the proportion of repukes to Democrats in these files is at least 12 to 1. There's a reason Krasnov didn't release this earlier when he had the chance: it will destroy the GQP brand. Remember Dennis Hastert? Gym Jordan? Well, they weren't the only ones with a predilection for children.

All you need to know that we're on the right track is how Krasnov is squirming and misdirecting. If this were to his benefit he would have released it long ago!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice Department Told Trump in May That His Name Is Among Many in the Epstein Files [View all] moonshinegnomie Jul 2025 OP

drip drip cilla4progress Jul 2025 #1

Being mentioned isn't a sign of wrongdoing; doing all you can to hide this fact certainly is, however . . . Journeyman Jul 2025 #2

Exactly, Journeyman! HeartsCanHope Jul 2025 #22

Rupert doesn't appear to be playing this time.🧨 BlueKota Jul 2025 #3

I wonder whats gotten into the scumbag ? CentralMass Jul 2025 #7

This is just a guess on my part. BlueKota Jul 2025 #13

Thats is a sound theory. Vance met with Murdoch right before the WSJ dropped the Epstein letter. CentralMass Jul 2025 #20

Australians know Murdock well... FarPoint Jul 2025 #29

Never thought I'd see the day I'd root for Murdoch, BlueKota Jul 2025 #30

Was Trump ever interviewed by the FBI about Epstein? Frasier Balzov Jul 2025 #4

Fake files. twodogsbarking Jul 2025 #5

Blame Obama and Hillary Clinton Bayard Jul 2025 #11

How can Trump's name be in files that don't exist? Botany Jul 2025 #27

There is no way that the DOJ are the sole custodian johnnyfins Jul 2025 #6

We can hope. CentralMass Jul 2025 #8

I mean...hello! The Biden Admin. was in there for four years. NCDem47 Jul 2025 #9

Elon made it clear he knew what was in the Epstein files. Irish_Dem Jul 2025 #23

He could have just known that Bondi told johnnyfins Jul 2025 #24

Possible, but highly inappropriate and imprudent for her to disclose this to anyone else. Irish_Dem Jul 2025 #25

WSJ reports DOJ told Trump he is in Epstein files, 'enormously consequential' OKIsItJustMe Jul 2025 #10

I'm really starting to wonder if Murdoch and some of his buddies are done with Trump now that they got what they wanted jgmiller Jul 2025 #12

I'm not Strelnikov_ Jul 2025 #16

Maddow Blog-Justice Department reportedly told Trump in May that his name is in the Epstein files LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2025 #14

The Trump Epstein Files cover-up continues Hassler Jul 2025 #15

Kabuki theatre. And end result in next decade. Maybe. Evolve Dammit Jul 2025 #17

Of course they are Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2025 #18

Yep Scott Alan Swaggerty Jul 2025 #19

I thought I heard shredders from a few hundred miles away up in D.C. from down here. cstanleytech Jul 2025 #21

A known rapist and criminal is named in documents about another known rapist and criminal. Irish_Dem Jul 2025 #26

Why isn't it obvious? viva la Jul 2025 #28

Be careful what we ask for, I suspect there may be some on our doc03 Jul 2025 #31

not that politics should come into play when prosecuting a child molestation ring... cadoman Jul 2025 #34

"His name is among many" but there is no list IronLionZion Jul 2025 #32

Imagine if MAGA was this worked up about women being sexually assaulted DrFunkenstein Jul 2025 #33