Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(171,435 posts)
Tue Apr 14, 2026, 04:15 PM Apr 14

US edges closer to popular vote deciding winner of presidential elections [View all]

Source: The Guardian

Tue 14 Apr 2026 13.12 EDT
Last modified on Tue 14 Apr 2026 14.08 EDT


A national majority vote for president is one step closer to reality after the Virginia governor, Abigail Spanberger, signed the national popular vote bill into law, joining an interstate compact with 17 other states and the District of Columbia. Under the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, states would assign their presidential electors to the winner of the popular vote, regardless of the results within the state.

The compact takes effect when states representing a majority of electoral votes – 270 of 538 – pass the legislation and thus would determine the winner of the presidential contest. With Virginia, the compact now has 222 electors. Every state that has so far enacted the compact has Democratic electoral majorities, including California, New York and Illinois. But legislation has been introduced in enough states to reach the 270-elector threshold, including swing states like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The legislation relies on two provisions of the US constitution, which would face intense legal scrutiny if and when the compact comes into force. Article II, section 1 of the constitution authorizes each state to appoint electors “in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct”. The constitution does not require states to even have a vote for president, never mind delegating those electors as a state’s voters choose. The second provision, article I, section 10, clause 3 of the US constitution, governs interstate compacts. The text authorizes states to form legally binding agreements governing their relationships to one another.

The text requires states to gain the assent of Congress to enact a compact. But longstanding US supreme court precedent holds that states only require congressional approval for a compact if the agreement infringes on federal power. Supporters of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact argue that the delegation of electors is a state power, not a federal power. A Pew Research Center poll from 2024 showed that 63% of Americans would replace the electoral college with a national popular vote for president, with 35% opposing change.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/14/majority-vote-for-president-us-constitution



Link to National Popular Vote website - National Popular Vote

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K&R, thanks for posting. c-rational Apr 14 #1
The Roberts court would overturn it Fiendish Thingy Apr 14 #2
Unless it's a Constitutional amendment. Wednesdays Apr 14 #5
Well, not yet they haven't. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 14 #7
Yeah, because it's not "ripe" yet. nt Wednesdays Apr 14 #10
They wouldn't need to strike it down. Starfury Apr 14 #22
The Colorado ruling was unanimous Fiendish Thingy Apr 14 #24
Not just Roberts and the other 5... Polybius Apr 14 #19
"Supporters...argue that the delegation of electors is a state power, not federal..." Wednesdays Apr 14 #3
There's no solutions like bucolic_frolic Apr 14 #4
I don't follow your logic Fiendish Thingy Apr 14 #9
So, to play devils advocate. OldBaldy1701E Apr 15 #27
Currently, small states have outsized power and representation Fiendish Thingy Apr 15 #30
'Outsized'? OldBaldy1701E Apr 15 #31
The senate is the equalizer Fiendish Thingy Apr 15 #33
This only affects the presidency, not congress. eggplant Apr 14 #13
Not sure- R0ckyRac00n Apr 14 #14
Fun until OH, FL find extra 300,000 votes. Festivito Apr 15 #32
Lots of the same Democrats who support displacedvermoter Apr 14 #6
Thomas Court would overturn if passed Miguelito Loveless Apr 14 #8
It'll be at least a 7-2 decision Polybius Apr 14 #21
Not if there are 13 justices ruling Fiendish Thingy Apr 15 #34
The ANTI-SHITSTAIN Law/compact dave99 Apr 14 #11
...popular vote deciding winner of presidential elections. as it should be. republianmushroom Apr 14 #12
The EC is way overdue to die Bayard Apr 14 #15
Hey, BumRush... calimary Apr 14 #16
Appreciate the comment BumRushDaShow Apr 14 #18
After 2000--and certainly after 2016--every Democrat should be on board with this by now. If the GOP wants to tie Karasu Apr 14 #17
The EC invites shenanigans The Wizard Apr 14 #20
Georgia will never go for this............... NGeorgian Apr 14 #23
It's not as solld red as states like OK or ID BumRushDaShow Apr 15 #25
Seems like there's a workaround for the compact issue Shrek Apr 15 #26
That video answered questions I didn't even know I had Ruby the Liberal Apr 15 #28
"at least stop electing by land mass instead of voters." BumRushDaShow Apr 15 #29
Of course, if the votes are not counted correctly.... returnee Apr 15 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US edges closer to popula...