Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ImNotGod

(1,338 posts)

1. Since the 6 fascist court majority are so afraid of their security, a problem they themselves created, I would be

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Jun 30, 2026, 02:01 PM

Tuesday

Last edited Tue Jun 30, 2026, 03:22 PM - Edit history (1)

surprised if they rule against the bans. They are spending a ton of taxpayer money on security upgrades, protection from the very gun toting wingnuts they emboldened.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court will consider whether laws called assault weapons bans violate the Second Amendment [View all] BumRushDaShow Tuesday OP

Since the 6 fascist court majority are so afraid of their security, a problem they themselves created, I would be ImNotGod Tuesday #1

Or their fears could cause them to vote against the bans PatSeg Tuesday #2

If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux Tuesday #3

Who said "small artillery"? And one boy's small is anothers ginormous. erronis Tuesday #7

If they do, well, then, it's machine guns for everyone ashredux Tuesday #4

how come they ignore the well-regulated part of the 2nd? pansypoo53219 Tuesday #5

You know, one of these years .. not in my lifetime ... the Court will finally take "well-regulated' into account. ificandream Tuesday #12

If you had participated in DU's long-ago Gungeon debates, you'd know maxsolomon Tuesday #14

language does change. pansypoo53219 Tuesday #15

Tell that to the "Originalists" maxsolomon 13 hrs ago #16

This was addressed in the Heller decision PCB66 12 hrs ago #17

It would seem to me Mr.Bee Tuesday #6

Ballistic missile? Bullets made with spent uranium? (Or not spent yet.) erronis Tuesday #8

It was written for muskets Bayard Tuesday #9

With so many Americans living in fear of someone lost knocking on their door, Torchlight Tuesday #10

"Supreme Court will consider" J_William_Ryan Tuesday #11

The only possible way and i mean only possible way THIS supreme court would ban assault weapons is bluestarone Tuesday #13

If they're so original purr-rat beauty 12 hrs ago #18

That's already been decided in Caetano v Massachusetts in 2016 which said the 2A is not limited to the tech at the time DetroitLegalBeagle 9 hrs ago #19