Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(39,044 posts)
8. "Dirty" compared to natural gas?
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 06:14 PM
Nov 24

Surely you must be joking.

The difference is that nuclear waste can be contained. Fossil fuel waste cannot, it's simply dumped everywhere. Some of that fossil fuel waste is radioactive, carcinogenic, etc., etc.. Natural gas accidents can destroy entire neighborhoods, flames spewing toxins everywhere. Worst of all, fossil fuel waste causes global warming.

Nuclear waste won't destroy the world as we know it. Fossil fuel waste will, and is doing so as I write this.

We've been very well trained to ignore the dangers of fossil fuels, most of all the very real threat of global warming.

Wind and solar promotion is climate change denial "light" (as in light beer) and will only prolong our dependency on fossil fuels, doing nothing in the long run to reduce the total amount of greenhouse gasses humans dump into earth's atmosphere.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Solar power glut boosts C...»Reply #8