Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Election Reform

FBaggins

(27,922 posts)

17. "I would think" is the key

Reply to G2theD (Reply #15)

Thu Aug 4, 2022, 06:55 AM

Aug 2022

There is no such legal standard.

Democrats want as many people to vote as possible and therefore want it to be as easy to do as possible. But that isn’t legally at all the same thing as saying “anything other than our preferred policies are tantamount to disenfranchisement” when nobody actually loses the right to vote

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Forgotten Constitutional Weapon Against Voter Restrictions [View all] elleng Aug 2022 OP

You enforce the Constitution through litigation in the courts and with the Court /nt bucolic_frolic Aug 2022 #1

Tell us which states would lose reps. instead of... brush Aug 2022 #2

No more legit than Trump having Pence declare him the winner FBaggins Aug 2022 #3

Not legit? It's in the Constitution! G2theD Aug 2022 #8

No it isn't FBaggins Aug 2022 #9

Really? G2theD Aug 2022 #10

Yes, really FBaggins Aug 2022 #13

No, that's not a good example G2theD Aug 2022 #15

"I would think" is the key FBaggins Aug 2022 #17

You are quite wrong and I'll leave it at that. G2theD Aug 2022 #19

But it doesn't say that, does it? G2theD Aug 2022 #11

Sure it does FBaggins Aug 2022 #12

But they already have a republican form of government G2theD Aug 2022 #14

Duh. FBaggins Aug 2022 #16

Duh yourself. G2theD Aug 2022 #18

Fascinating. Thanks for sharing. Joinfortmill Aug 2022 #4

It's worth trying. At least people will know it exists housecat Aug 2022 #5

Let's see how the "originalist" judges vote on this one. mjvpi Aug 2022 #6

and never yet addressed! elleng Aug 2022 #7

I read the lawsuit. It isn't at all what this reporting implies FBaggins Aug 2022 #20

No that's not what it says scipan Aug 2022 #21