Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Rail Safety Megathread. Updated July 23, 2024 [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(60,935 posts)5. Report: Train didn't heed stop signal in deadly Panhandle wreck
Report: Train didn't heed stop signal in deadly Panhandle wreck
The NTSB report can be seen at the linked website.
Here is more about that "preliminary federal report released Thursday."
Please keep in mind as you read this and other articles that this is a preliminary report. There is still much to learn.
Collision of two BNSF trains Executive Summary
Western Railroad Discussion > NTSB preliminary report collision at Panhandle, Texas
Report: Train didn't heed stop signal in deadly Panhandle wreck
Posted: July 14, 2016 - 10:25am
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
DALLAS (AP) A train failed to heed a stop signal before it barreled head-on into another freight train last month in the Texas Panhandle, killing three, according to a preliminary federal report released Thursday.
An eastbound BNSF Railway train failed to slow at a yellow warning signal on June 28 and then continued past a red stop signal before striking an oncoming BNSF train, inspectors for the National Transportation Safety Board said in the report.
The eastbound train, bound for Chicago, was supposed to stop and allow the Los Angeles-bound train to pass. It was traveling just over 60 mph when it passed the yellow signal, though trains are not supposed to travel any faster than 40 mph at a yellow signal so that they can stop in time at a red signal. The train was traveling about 65 mph when it passed the stop signal.
NTSB spokesman Terry Williams said it's not clear how far beyond the stop signal that the point of impact occurred. ... "We're still in the gathering phase of this investigation," he said, adding that a final NTSB report will be released at some point next year. He declined to comment further. ... The collision occurred outside the town of Panhandle, about 25 miles northeast of Amarillo. Each train was carrying two crew members. One jumped to safety, the other three died.
Posted: July 14, 2016 - 10:25am
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
DALLAS (AP) A train failed to heed a stop signal before it barreled head-on into another freight train last month in the Texas Panhandle, killing three, according to a preliminary federal report released Thursday.
An eastbound BNSF Railway train failed to slow at a yellow warning signal on June 28 and then continued past a red stop signal before striking an oncoming BNSF train, inspectors for the National Transportation Safety Board said in the report.
The eastbound train, bound for Chicago, was supposed to stop and allow the Los Angeles-bound train to pass. It was traveling just over 60 mph when it passed the yellow signal, though trains are not supposed to travel any faster than 40 mph at a yellow signal so that they can stop in time at a red signal. The train was traveling about 65 mph when it passed the stop signal.
NTSB spokesman Terry Williams said it's not clear how far beyond the stop signal that the point of impact occurred. ... "We're still in the gathering phase of this investigation," he said, adding that a final NTSB report will be released at some point next year. He declined to comment further. ... The collision occurred outside the town of Panhandle, about 25 miles northeast of Amarillo. Each train was carrying two crew members. One jumped to safety, the other three died.
The NTSB report can be seen at the linked website.
Here is more about that "preliminary federal report released Thursday."
Please keep in mind as you read this and other articles that this is a preliminary report. There is still much to learn.
Thursday, July 14, 2016
NTSB releases preliminary report on BNSF Panhandle collision
Written by Mischa Wanek-Libman, Engineering Editor
One of the trains involved in the June 28 head-on collision between two BNSF intermodal trains outside of Panhandle, Texas passed a red signal before the accident. ... This comes from the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) preliminary report of the incident, which was published July 13.
The report reads, "The signal system was lined to route the westbound train into the Panhandle control point siding at milepost 526.1 while holding the eastbound train on the main track before the east end of the siding.
"Preliminary review of signal event recorder data and tests of the signal system indicate the last signal the eastbound train passed before the collision was a stop (red) signal. The previous signal the eastbound train passed was an approach (yellow) signal.
"A preliminary review of locomotive event recorder data revealed that the eastbound train was traveling about 62 mph when it went by the approach signal at the west end of the Panhandle siding and about 65 mph when it went by the stop signal at the east end of the Panhandle siding.
....
NTSB said the investigation is ongoing and it will supplement or correct information during the course of its investigation. Full report HERE.
NTSB releases preliminary report on BNSF Panhandle collision
Written by Mischa Wanek-Libman, Engineering Editor
One of the trains involved in the June 28 head-on collision between two BNSF intermodal trains outside of Panhandle, Texas passed a red signal before the accident. ... This comes from the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) preliminary report of the incident, which was published July 13.
The report reads, "The signal system was lined to route the westbound train into the Panhandle control point siding at milepost 526.1 while holding the eastbound train on the main track before the east end of the siding.
"Preliminary review of signal event recorder data and tests of the signal system indicate the last signal the eastbound train passed before the collision was a stop (red) signal. The previous signal the eastbound train passed was an approach (yellow) signal.
"A preliminary review of locomotive event recorder data revealed that the eastbound train was traveling about 62 mph when it went by the approach signal at the west end of the Panhandle siding and about 65 mph when it went by the stop signal at the east end of the Panhandle siding.
....
NTSB said the investigation is ongoing and it will supplement or correct information during the course of its investigation. Full report HERE.
Collision of two BNSF trains Executive Summary
Western Railroad Discussion > NTSB preliminary report collision at Panhandle, Texas
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Federal Officials Order New Safety Measures to Help Protect Railroad Workers Near Tracks
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
#1
Colorado railroad crossing where 5 family members were killed was awaiting improvements
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
#2
FRA issues final rule on identifying passenger railroad safety hazards
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2016
#6
Number of U.S. railroad workers testing positive for drug use skyrockets
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2016
#7
NTSB releases witness interviews and documents related to deadly 2016 Panhandle, TX train collision
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
#12
Wilmington News Journal - Delaware Online: Rail safety questioned as fuel shipments likely to go up
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
#13
Ignored Safety Procedures, Fractured Safety Program Led to Fatal Amtrak Derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2017
#20
2016: CSX train derails in Northeast Washington, leaking hazardous chemicals and disrupting travel
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2017
#23
Could Amtrak catastrophe happen in Sacramento? It almost did, leaving some riders scared and angry
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2017
#28
BNSF to {Continue Installation of PTC} as Part of Annual Capital Program
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2018
#35
Operation Lifesaver, Federal Railroad Administration award safety grants in 16 states
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2018
#39
The State of Positive Train Control Implementation in the United States
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2018
#41
Truck driver involved in crash with Amtrak train carrying GOP lawmakers had marijuana and a prescrip
Eugene
Mar 2019
#45
Amtrak Struggles to Screen Workers for Drug, Alcohol Abuse, Report Finds
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2019
#46
Positive train control fully activated on Amtrak Cascades corridor, Washington State DOT says
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2019
#47
New safety system launch causes some delays for Virginia Railway Express
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#48
Federal Officials Order New Safety Measures to Help Protect Railroad Workers Near Tracks
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#51
50 years later, lifesaving technology that could have saved over 300 lives inches toward completion.
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#52
NTSB releases accident report on February 2018 Amtrak -- CSX head-on collision in South Carolina
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2019
#54
Department of Transportation issues new rules on shipping liquefied natural gas (LNG) by rail
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2020
#58
NTSB: Engineer in 2019 CSX collision in Ohio was intoxicated (updated)
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2020
#59
Train derailments like the Montana incident are rare, but other rail-related deaths are on the rise
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2021
#62
NTSB urges railroads to boost safety measures for workers on the rails
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2021
#63
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) On-Site Coordinator, East Palestine Train Derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2023
#69
Wayside detectors in spotlight after Norfolk Southern derailment in Ohio
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2023
#70
Ohio train derailment spurs rail safety advisory on hot box detectors
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#72
A Veteran Railroader's Perspective on East Palestine and the Rail Industry's Future
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#73
FRA Safety Advisory 2023-01; Evaluation of Policies and Procedures of Hot Bearing Wayside Detectors
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#74
States hold little power on railroads. They're still trying to tighten rules.
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#77
Feds urge railroads to review sharing of hazardous shipment information
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#79
Class Is agree to join FRA's close-call system; CSX highlights record safety performance
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#82
FRA Announces Supplemental Safety Assessment of Norfolk Southern Railway's Operations
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#84
WHITE PAPER: Management of In-Train Forces - Challenges and Directions, First Addendum
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2023
#85
Federal Railroad Administration Safety Advisory 2023-03; Accident Mitigation and Train Length
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2023
#87
USDOT Proposes Requirements for Real-time Hazmat Information for Firefighters and First Responders
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2023
#89
Miles-long trains are blocking first responders when every minute counts
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2023
#90
Witness testifies freight car involved in NS train derailment was not inspected
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2023
#91
Norfolk Southern staffer, working solo, missed danger signs of impending Ohio crash
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2023
#92
6 months after the East Palestine train derailment, Congress is deadlocked on new rules for safety
BumRushDaShow
Aug 2023
#93
Missouri budgets $50M for railroad crossings in response to fatal 2022 Amtrak derailment
Eugene
Aug 2023
#94
Norfolk Southern content with minimum safety too often, regulators say after fiery Ohio derailment
Eugene
Aug 2023
#95
OSHA announces citations, agreements in connection to train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2023
#96
Rail whistleblowers fired for voicing safety concerns despite efforts to end practice of retaliation
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2023
#97
Rail union wants new rules to improve conductor training in the wake of 2 trainee deaths
Eugene
Aug 2023
#98
Railroads resist joining safety hotline because they want to be able to discipline workers
Eugene
Aug 2023
#99
Rule allowing rail shipments of LNG will be put on hold to allow more study of safety concerns
Eugene
Aug 2023
#100
Explosion in Union Pacific's massive railyard in Nebraska appears accidental, investigators say
Eugene
Sep 2023
#101
Broken rail caused fatal Colorado train derailment that collapsed bridge, early findings show
Eugene
Oct 2023
#102
Railroad automatic braking system needs improvement to prevent more derailments, safety board says
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2023
#103
Chicago commuter train crashes into rail equipment, injures at least 19, 3 seriously, official says
Eugene
Nov 2023
#104
Railyard explosion, inspections raise safety questions about Union Pacific's hazmat shipping
Eugene
Nov 2023
#105
What's Missing From Railroad Safety Data? Dead Workers and Severed Limbs.
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2024
#106
Pennsylvania train crash highlights shortcomings of automated railroad braking system
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#107
NTSB Preliminary Report: Norfolk Southern Train Collisions and Derailment near Easton, Pennsylvania
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#109
FRA report on East Palestine derailment differs slightly from NTSB analysis
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2024
#111