Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Rail Safety Megathread. Updated July 23, 2024 [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(60,931 posts)21. USDOT opts to repeal ECP brake rulemaking
Last edited Wed Dec 6, 2017, 05:15 PM - Edit history (5)
Rail News: Federal Legislation & Regulation
12/5/2017
USDOT opts to repeal ECP brake rulemaking
Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) repealed a May 2015 rulemaking that would have required the installation of electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) brakes on certain tank cars, according to U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). The USDOT had until Dec. 4 to publish a determination that the ECP rule either was justified or should be repealed.
The Federal Railroad Administration rulemaking had set a timetable for requiring ECP brakes on newer tank cars trains used to haul certain hazardous or flammable materials, such as ethanol and crude oil. ECP brakes issue electronic signals to simultaneously apply and release brakes throughout the length of a train instead of each car applying brakes individually a system the government considers more effective in emergency situations.
A provision in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act directed the National Academies of Sciences (NAS) to analyze the rule and reevaluate ECP braking results. In a report issued in October, NAS officials said the approach used to mandate ECP brakes over other technologies was incomplete and unconvincing, said Thune who chairs the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in a press release. NAS officials also could not conclude that ECP brakes' emergency performance was superior to other braking systems, he said. ... Moreover, a Government Accountability Office (GAO) study released in October 2016 found the UDOT's justification for the rulemaking lacked transparency, said Thune. The FAST Act had required the GAO to conduct an independent evidence-based evaluation of ECP brakes.
....
The Association of American Railroads (AAR) had lobbied to repeal the rulemaking. AAR officials believe the widespread use of ECP brakes would not provide any meaningful safety benefits compared with existing braking systems, and that the brakes would impose very high costs on railroads for minimal safety benefits.
12/5/2017
USDOT opts to repeal ECP brake rulemaking
Yesterday, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) repealed a May 2015 rulemaking that would have required the installation of electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) brakes on certain tank cars, according to U.S. Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). The USDOT had until Dec. 4 to publish a determination that the ECP rule either was justified or should be repealed.
The Federal Railroad Administration rulemaking had set a timetable for requiring ECP brakes on newer tank cars trains used to haul certain hazardous or flammable materials, such as ethanol and crude oil. ECP brakes issue electronic signals to simultaneously apply and release brakes throughout the length of a train instead of each car applying brakes individually a system the government considers more effective in emergency situations.
A provision in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act directed the National Academies of Sciences (NAS) to analyze the rule and reevaluate ECP braking results. In a report issued in October, NAS officials said the approach used to mandate ECP brakes over other technologies was incomplete and unconvincing, said Thune who chairs the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in a press release. NAS officials also could not conclude that ECP brakes' emergency performance was superior to other braking systems, he said. ... Moreover, a Government Accountability Office (GAO) study released in October 2016 found the UDOT's justification for the rulemaking lacked transparency, said Thune. The FAST Act had required the GAO to conduct an independent evidence-based evaluation of ECP brakes.
....
The Association of American Railroads (AAR) had lobbied to repeal the rulemaking. AAR officials believe the widespread use of ECP brakes would not provide any meaningful safety benefits compared with existing braking systems, and that the brakes would impose very high costs on railroads for minimal safety benefits.
National Academies of Sciences ECP report:
Review of Department of Transportation Testing of Electronically Controlled Pneumatic Brakes
or
Committee on the Review of Department of Transportation Testing of Electronically Controlled Pneumatic Brakes
Official news release (from PHMSA, not FRA. Why?):
USDOT Announces Intent to Repeal Electronically Controlled Pneumatic Brake Mandate
December 4, 2017
Contact: DOT Press Office
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
WASHINGTON - In accordance with the Fixing Americas Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (Public Law 114-94), the U.S. Department of Transportation today announced the final updated Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in regard to Electronically Controlled Pneumatic (ECP) brakes on certain trains. After careful review in accordance with the Congressional mandate contained in the FAST Act, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) will rescind the ECP mandate.
This determination was made with congressionally-mandated input from the National Academy of Sciences Transportation Research Board, U.S. General Accountability Office (GAO) and studies by the FRA, which found that the cost-benefit analyses are not sufficient justification for mandating ECP brakes.
The National Academy of Sciences determined it was unable to make a conclusive statement regarding the emergency performance of ECP brakes relative to other braking systems. In addition, the updated RIA incorporated recommendations from audits conducted by the U.S. General Accountability Office and updated costs and benefits of the ECP brake provision based on current economic conditions. This review demonstrated that the costs of this mandate would exceed three-fold the benefits it would produce.
###
Contact Us
Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
United States
phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov
Phone: 202-366-4831
Fax: 202-366-7431
December 4, 2017
Contact: DOT Press Office
Tel.: (202) 366-4570
WASHINGTON - In accordance with the Fixing Americas Surface Transportation (FAST) Act (Public Law 114-94), the U.S. Department of Transportation today announced the final updated Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in regard to Electronically Controlled Pneumatic (ECP) brakes on certain trains. After careful review in accordance with the Congressional mandate contained in the FAST Act, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) will rescind the ECP mandate.
This determination was made with congressionally-mandated input from the National Academy of Sciences Transportation Research Board, U.S. General Accountability Office (GAO) and studies by the FRA, which found that the cost-benefit analyses are not sufficient justification for mandating ECP brakes.
The National Academy of Sciences determined it was unable to make a conclusive statement regarding the emergency performance of ECP brakes relative to other braking systems. In addition, the updated RIA incorporated recommendations from audits conducted by the U.S. General Accountability Office and updated costs and benefits of the ECP brake provision based on current economic conditions. This review demonstrated that the costs of this mandate would exceed three-fold the benefits it would produce.
###
Contact Us
Office of Governmental, International, and Public Affairs
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
United States
phmsa.publicaffairs@dot.gov
Phone: 202-366-4831
Fax: 202-366-7431
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Federal Officials Order New Safety Measures to Help Protect Railroad Workers Near Tracks
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
#1
Colorado railroad crossing where 5 family members were killed was awaiting improvements
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
#2
FRA issues final rule on identifying passenger railroad safety hazards
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2016
#6
Number of U.S. railroad workers testing positive for drug use skyrockets
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2016
#7
NTSB releases witness interviews and documents related to deadly 2016 Panhandle, TX train collision
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
#12
Wilmington News Journal - Delaware Online: Rail safety questioned as fuel shipments likely to go up
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
#13
Ignored Safety Procedures, Fractured Safety Program Led to Fatal Amtrak Derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2017
#20
2016: CSX train derails in Northeast Washington, leaking hazardous chemicals and disrupting travel
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2017
#23
Could Amtrak catastrophe happen in Sacramento? It almost did, leaving some riders scared and angry
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2017
#28
BNSF to {Continue Installation of PTC} as Part of Annual Capital Program
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2018
#35
Operation Lifesaver, Federal Railroad Administration award safety grants in 16 states
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2018
#39
The State of Positive Train Control Implementation in the United States
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2018
#41
Truck driver involved in crash with Amtrak train carrying GOP lawmakers had marijuana and a prescrip
Eugene
Mar 2019
#45
Amtrak Struggles to Screen Workers for Drug, Alcohol Abuse, Report Finds
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2019
#46
Positive train control fully activated on Amtrak Cascades corridor, Washington State DOT says
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2019
#47
New safety system launch causes some delays for Virginia Railway Express
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#48
Federal Officials Order New Safety Measures to Help Protect Railroad Workers Near Tracks
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#51
50 years later, lifesaving technology that could have saved over 300 lives inches toward completion.
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#52
NTSB releases accident report on February 2018 Amtrak -- CSX head-on collision in South Carolina
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2019
#54
Department of Transportation issues new rules on shipping liquefied natural gas (LNG) by rail
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2020
#58
NTSB: Engineer in 2019 CSX collision in Ohio was intoxicated (updated)
mahatmakanejeeves
Sep 2020
#59
Train derailments like the Montana incident are rare, but other rail-related deaths are on the rise
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2021
#62
NTSB urges railroads to boost safety measures for workers on the rails
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2021
#63
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) On-Site Coordinator, East Palestine Train Derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2023
#69
Wayside detectors in spotlight after Norfolk Southern derailment in Ohio
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2023
#70
Ohio train derailment spurs rail safety advisory on hot box detectors
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#72
A Veteran Railroader's Perspective on East Palestine and the Rail Industry's Future
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#73
FRA Safety Advisory 2023-01; Evaluation of Policies and Procedures of Hot Bearing Wayside Detectors
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#74
States hold little power on railroads. They're still trying to tighten rules.
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#77
Feds urge railroads to review sharing of hazardous shipment information
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#79
Class Is agree to join FRA's close-call system; CSX highlights record safety performance
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#82
FRA Announces Supplemental Safety Assessment of Norfolk Southern Railway's Operations
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2023
#84
WHITE PAPER: Management of In-Train Forces - Challenges and Directions, First Addendum
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2023
#85
Federal Railroad Administration Safety Advisory 2023-03; Accident Mitigation and Train Length
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2023
#87
USDOT Proposes Requirements for Real-time Hazmat Information for Firefighters and First Responders
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2023
#89
Miles-long trains are blocking first responders when every minute counts
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2023
#90
Witness testifies freight car involved in NS train derailment was not inspected
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2023
#91
Norfolk Southern staffer, working solo, missed danger signs of impending Ohio crash
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2023
#92
6 months after the East Palestine train derailment, Congress is deadlocked on new rules for safety
BumRushDaShow
Aug 2023
#93
Missouri budgets $50M for railroad crossings in response to fatal 2022 Amtrak derailment
Eugene
Aug 2023
#94
Norfolk Southern content with minimum safety too often, regulators say after fiery Ohio derailment
Eugene
Aug 2023
#95
OSHA announces citations, agreements in connection to train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2023
#96
Rail whistleblowers fired for voicing safety concerns despite efforts to end practice of retaliation
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2023
#97
Rail union wants new rules to improve conductor training in the wake of 2 trainee deaths
Eugene
Aug 2023
#98
Railroads resist joining safety hotline because they want to be able to discipline workers
Eugene
Aug 2023
#99
Rule allowing rail shipments of LNG will be put on hold to allow more study of safety concerns
Eugene
Aug 2023
#100
Explosion in Union Pacific's massive railyard in Nebraska appears accidental, investigators say
Eugene
Sep 2023
#101
Broken rail caused fatal Colorado train derailment that collapsed bridge, early findings show
Eugene
Oct 2023
#102
Railroad automatic braking system needs improvement to prevent more derailments, safety board says
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2023
#103
Chicago commuter train crashes into rail equipment, injures at least 19, 3 seriously, official says
Eugene
Nov 2023
#104
Railyard explosion, inspections raise safety questions about Union Pacific's hazmat shipping
Eugene
Nov 2023
#105
What's Missing From Railroad Safety Data? Dead Workers and Severed Limbs.
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2024
#106
Pennsylvania train crash highlights shortcomings of automated railroad braking system
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#107
NTSB Preliminary Report: Norfolk Southern Train Collisions and Derailment near Easton, Pennsylvania
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2024
#109
FRA report on East Palestine derailment differs slightly from NTSB analysis
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2024
#111