Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(35,050 posts)
7. Oh, and by the way, since you raise the point...
Mon Feb 3, 2025, 02:12 PM
Monday

...of so called "nuclear waste" and declare it a "problem" can you point to any time in period in the 70 year history of the generation of commercial used nuclear fuel, or even the entire history of its accumulation that it injured as many people as will die today from fossil fuel waste? The number of people who will die today, like every other day in the past few decades, is about 19,000.

I will accept as an answer references from reputable sources, ideally the primary scientific literature.

Which is a worse problem, so called "nuclear waste" or extreme global heating driven by fossil fuel wastes?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Revolutionary Kawasaki Hy...»Reply #7