Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,873 posts)
8. I have never confused feasibility with inevitability.
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 10:25 AM
Yesterday

I have thousands upon thousands of scientific papers on the subject of carbon dioxide in my personal files.

The one that sticks most prominently in my mind is the 2011 paper by Nobel Laureate George Olah, published in JACS 133, 33, 12881-12898 on closed carbon cycles. The paper is now 15 years old. It is obvious the advice was ignored.

I am not in my own opinion, an optimist. On the contrary, I regard myself as a cynical. I do believe that the capture of atmospheric carbon dioxide resides on the border between feasible and impossible, best by the intermediate agency of seawater. I do not however believe it will be accomplished. One should never underestimate the power of ignorance. Just look at the creature residing in the White House if you don't believe me.

One of the things present in all energy conversations, including this one, especially this one, is myopia.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»2026 Study on whether EV'...»Reply #8