Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

muriel_volestrangler

(106,869 posts)

9. The thing is that you attack any method of decreasing CO2 emissions that doesn't equal your "feasible" end technology

Reply to NNadir (Reply #8)

Fri Jun 26, 2026, 10:35 AM

Yesterday

You're wishing that no one does anything to use batteries, hydrogen, or any other means of powering transport, until your "on the border between feasible and impossible" capture of atmospheric CO2 has been achieved, even though your own preferred method of energy generation, nuclear fission, needs at least one of these means for a transport solution.

That's why I think you're a hopeless optimist. You want to bet the world on this technology being achieved, and think that ignoring other possibilities would be fine - you must think this carbon capture will turn up any day now.

Myopia? Yes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

2026 Study on whether EV's are better for the environment than ICE vehicles (not one from 2019) [View all] Finishline42 Thursday OP

Oh boy!!!! A tweet about a "study." All those batteries are saving the world.... NNadir Thursday #1

2019 refers to Table 1 in the study Finishline42 Yesterday #2

If one reads the scientific literature regularly and in detail, as I do... NNadir Yesterday #5

Personal example of what EV's are doing that ICE vehicles won't - GET CHEAPER Finishline42 22 hrs ago #11

I do understand that there are people who consider themselves noble and "green" based on their bourgeois... NNadir 19 hrs ago #12

Here's a Sankey diagram - What's rejected energy??? Finishline42 Yesterday #3

What is your solution for transport? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #4

Dimethyl ether produced with the industrial scale hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. NNadir Yesterday #6

Oh. so it's an unproven atmospheric carbon capture strategy? muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #7

I have never confused feasibility with inevitability. NNadir Yesterday #8

The thing is that you attack any method of decreasing CO2 emissions that doesn't equal your "feasible" end technology muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #9

My opinions on energy have been developed over 40 years of literature research. NNadir Yesterday #10