Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetlefK

(16,459 posts)
35. re
Thu Jun 8, 2017, 04:25 AM
Jun 2017

To quote you:
"Wrong. The world shouldn't only consist of people, dogs and cats. With increasing human population and loss of habitat for animals, that is exactly what will happen. A doe eating a flower in someone's yard, and your response that deer will cause traffic accidents? Alcoholics cause accidents. Okay to shoot them? "

It's very simple. Cities are not nature. They are the artificial habitat of an intelligent species that has ENTIRELY different priorities from what animals want. Wild animals threaten these priorities. For example: Not stepping into shit, not being attacked by animals, not having accidents with animals, not getting diseases from animals.

Do you think that cities are animal-free because of some weird quirk? They are animal-free because that's how we want it, that's how we define them, that's how they are "supposed to be".




To quote you:
"And when was the last time you were attacked by a 'feral dog, feral cat, raccoon, rat and pigeon?' ... If rampant issues based on interactions with wild animals actually existed, you wouldn't have to 'lie' and say "We are being attacked by feral cats, dogs, raccoons and rats". "

Rampant issues with wild animals in cities do not exist because we actively prevent such situations. Your stance seems to be that such situations wouldn't happen in general, even if we weren't preventing them.



To quote you:
"And on that note, Feral dogs and cats are a problem caused by humans introducing them to an environment that did not have them in the first place."

Feral dogs (aka wolves) and feral cats have been around forever in the wilderness. The human introduced them as domesticated dogs and domesticated cats into cities. But unsupervised pets go feral again. And that's how you get feral animals in cities. The human did not introduce feral, problematic animals into cities.



To quote you:
"In Los Angeles, thousands of native bird species are extinct due to the 'feral cat' issue that you so readily brought up to defend your issue. Outside of getting a 'shot' at the doctor's office, I don't think there were any deaths due to feral cat attacks.. I could be wrong. But the problems started by human carelessness is far worse than us getting 'attacked by wild animals'. "

I really don't get your point here. Do think that feral cats are a problem because they kill birds or do you think they are not a problem because they do not kill humans???



To quote you:
"Racoons, possums, rats and birds. Leave them the f! alone."

And exactly that is not possible. Cities are our environment, not theirs. They do not belong here. They spread trash and diseases and that's why we CANNOT "leave them the f! alone."

What the fuck? [View all] retrowire Jun 2017 OP
How should I say this? DetlefK Jun 2017 #1
Lol retrowire Jun 2017 #3
I disagree J0D Jun 2017 #25
re DetlefK Jun 2017 #31
Just wow. J0D Jun 2017 #32
Thankfully never. Because they get put down. DetlefK Jun 2017 #33
I never said human beings introduced 'wild animals' into the cities.. J0D Jun 2017 #34
re DetlefK Jun 2017 #35
You can state how you think things are 'supposed to be' J0D Jun 2017 #36
I'm sorry that you see it that way. DetlefK Jun 2017 #37
I'm lucky I'm a hospice nurse so people are more understanding. mucifer Jun 2017 #2
HAHAHAHA HERES SOME STEAK LOLOLOL retrowire Jun 2017 #8
Unless MFM008 Jun 2017 #4
Not so nice FM123 Jun 2017 #5
Yeah I understand the own beliefs thing. retrowire Jun 2017 #6
Sometimes... roscoeroscoe Jun 2017 #7
I turn it around on people like that. byronius Jun 2017 #9
"But I'm a large male. It works. They shut up." JayhawkSD Jun 2017 #11
I only use it when people imply that dominance grants rights. byronius Jun 2017 #15
Perfect. 😁 Duppers Jun 2017 #22
I'm going to try this again. Very few people get this point. JayhawkSD Jun 2017 #10
Ok I get what you mean. retrowire Jun 2017 #12
Be as offended as you want to be. JayhawkSD Jun 2017 #18
As long as the conduct is legal customerserviceguy Jun 2017 #30
Zen. Duppers Jun 2017 #13
What am I complaining about? JayhawkSD Jun 2017 #19
My apologies. Duppers Jun 2017 #21
Now tell me again: WHO is on that "preachy high horse?" Squinch Jun 2017 #29
Not really ciaobaby Jun 2017 #14
And, I would add, assholes. Duppers Jun 2017 #23
Meat eaters are assholes? They intend to hurt others? Squinch Jun 2017 #28
Are they old enough to know that meat doesn't magically appear on styrofoam trays? LeftyMom Jun 2017 #38
So you think every meat eater is a person of bad character? Squinch Jun 2017 #41
Wait... meat eaters are more aggressive and angry? Squinch Jun 2017 #27
Sounds just like the logic of people who want to throw around the N-word. byronius Jun 2017 #16
This is amazing. Squinch Jun 2017 #26
Way back in the day I was in the Air Force stationed up in NY. cwydro Jun 2017 #17
One person gets it. I'm happy for you. nt JayhawkSD Jun 2017 #20
My parents instilled that in me many years ago. cwydro Jun 2017 #24
Hey kids, this is the AR/veg*n group, not the Justify Speciesism and Scold Veg*ns group LeftyMom Jun 2017 #39
THANK YOU retrowire Jun 2017 #40
It is, the group hosts are all pretty busy with life stuff right now. LeftyMom Jun 2017 #42
I hear ya. retrowire Jun 2017 #43
Thanks for asking. LeftyMom Jun 2017 #44
Your dad is not alone retrowire Jun 2017 #45
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Vegetarian, Vegan and Animal Rights»What the fuck?»Reply #35