Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: The Israeli Right still hasn't internalized that Palestinians exist [View all]TubbersUK
(1,441 posts)31. No, I'm aware of the difference
Last edited Sun Jul 24, 2016, 08:41 PM - Edit history (6)
To the best of my knowledge, expulsion under House Rules (as opposed to the 2015 Act) relates to criminal convictions & corruption. A total of 3 MPs were expelled under House Rules in the whole of the 2Oth Century.
In any case, if not currently in prison for more than a year, an expelled MP who thinks he/she has been treated unfairly may ask the voters to decide by standing for re-election.
House of Commons Information Office
Disciplinary and Penal
Powers of the House
As stated in the introduction to this Factsheet, expulsion is the ultimate power available to the
House to remove those it considers unfit for membership. Members in the past have been
expelled for such crimes as perjury, forgery, fraud and corruption.
House to remove those it considers unfit for membership. Members in the past have been
expelled for such crimes as perjury, forgery, fraud and corruption.
An expelled Member may seek re-election to the House, even within the term of the same
Parliament that elected him, a principle established in 1782 as a result of the case of John
Wilkes, who was expelled three times and once had his return amended in favour of his defeated
opponent.
Parliament that elected him, a principle established in 1782 as a result of the case of John
Wilkes, who was expelled three times and once had his return amended in favour of his defeated
opponent.
There have been three instances this century of expulsion:
Horatio Bottomley (Independent, South Hackney), was expelled in August 1922, after being
convicted of fraudulent conversion of property and sentenced to seven years' imprisonment.
Garry Allighan (Labour, Gravesend) was expelled on 30 October 1947, for lying to a committee
and for gross contempt of the House after publication of an article in the World's Press News
accusing Members of insobriety and of taking fees or bribes for the supply of information.
Peter Baker (Conservative, South Norfolk) was expelled on 16 December 1954, after being
sentenced to seven years' imprisonment for forgery.
Horatio Bottomley (Independent, South Hackney), was expelled in August 1922, after being
convicted of fraudulent conversion of property and sentenced to seven years' imprisonment.
Garry Allighan (Labour, Gravesend) was expelled on 30 October 1947, for lying to a committee
and for gross contempt of the House after publication of an article in the World's Press News
accusing Members of insobriety and of taking fees or bribes for the supply of information.
Peter Baker (Conservative, South Norfolk) was expelled on 16 December 1954, after being
sentenced to seven years' imprisonment for forgery.
https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/g06.pdf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's ironic that a full-blown fascist like Lieberman is making comparisons with "Mein Kampf"...
Little Tich
Jul 2016
#4
Kahanists are fascists, but Hamas & their supporters within BDS are arguably moreso....
shira
Jul 2016
#8
The sadly entertaining part is that they don't realize how badly they're lying to themselves
FBaggins
Jul 2016
#10
If you can't understand the difference between ousting politicians for moral turpitude and having a
Little Tich
Jul 2016
#21
Are you implying that Shaked didn't agree with the content of the article she posted?
Little Tich
Jul 2016
#28
Frankly, if the article was about killing Jews instead of Palestinians, it would be just as bad.
Little Tich
Jul 2016
#30