How to Explain Mansplaining *Feminist Group* [View all]
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/21/opinion/how-to-explain-mansplaining.html?_r=0
The manologue takes many forms, but is characterized by the proffering of words not asked for, of views not solicited and of arguments unsought. It is underwritten by the doubtful assumption that the audience will naturally be interested, and that this interest will not flag. And that when it comes to speeches or commentary, longer is better.
The prevalence of the manologue is deeply rooted in the fact that men take, and are allocated, more time to talk in almost every professional setting. Women self-censor, edit, apologize for speaking. Men expound.
<snip>
It is also clear that the more powerful men become, the more they speak. This would seem a natural correlation, but the same is not true for women. The reason for this, according to a Yale study, is because women worry about negative consequences that is, a backlash if they are more voluble. Troublingly, the study found that their fears were well founded, as both male and female listeners were quick to think these women were talking too much, too aggressively. In other words, men are rewarded for speaking, while women are punished.
The problem is global and endemic across all media. Female characters speak less in Disney films today than they used to even princesses get a minority of the speaking lines in films in which theyre the principal: In the 2013 animated movie Frozen, for example, male characters get 59 percent of the lines. A quick search for best monologues in film or movies reveals that they are almost all male. If you took Princess Leia out of Star Wars, the total speaking time for female characters is 63 seconds out of the original trilogys 386 minutes.
<snip>