Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]stone space
(6,498 posts)30. Please stop spamming my OP with meta reguarding your dissapointment with DU moderation.
You know that I am unable to even reply, due to the fact that such discussions of forum moderation are in direct violation of DU's TOS.
Don't interfere with forum moderation
Don't post messages about site rules, enforcement, juries, hosts, administration, alerts, alerters, removed posts, appeals, locked threads, or anything else related to how this website is moderated (except in the Ask the Administrators forum).
Why we have this rule: The purpose of Democratic Underground is to discuss politics, issues, and current events. Open discussion of how the website is run tends to distract from our core purpose.
Don't post messages about site rules, enforcement, juries, hosts, administration, alerts, alerters, removed posts, appeals, locked threads, or anything else related to how this website is moderated (except in the Ask the Administrators forum).
Why we have this rule: The purpose of Democratic Underground is to discuss politics, issues, and current events. Open discussion of how the website is run tends to distract from our core purpose.
Even with this reply to you, I risk being hidden for violation of TOS.
That is why your constant spammy meta-baiting is annoying. You do it, in violation of TOS, knowing full well that I can have my post hidden even for discussing your disappointments regarding DU's moderation system.
If you feel that a post violates TOS, then your remedy is to alert on the post in question, not to whine repeatedly about your disappointments over jury decisions that might not go your way.
Attempting to bait others with repeated spam into meta discussions regarding forum moderation decisions is inappropriate.
Do not expect me to reply to your meta-bating spam in the future.
I am in direct violation of TOS for even replying to your meta-baiting here in this post.
NOTE TO JURORS: Please note the meta-baiting spam listed below, the sheer volume of which has made it necessary for me to reply to the meta-bating in this one single post, even if it is in direct violation of DU's TOS.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post1
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post3
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post6
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post18
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post26
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post14
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post11
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post20
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post28
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post27
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028170785#post6
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028170785#post9
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028170785#post10
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post1
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post10
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post11
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post13
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post8
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Making false accusations against a latina student facing down domestic terrosism is a Trump move.
stone space
Sep 2016
#16
I've responded to several of your posts, but they are becoming spammy and appear to be meta baiting.
stone space
Sep 2016
#24
Please stop spamming my OP with meta reguarding your dissapointment with DU moderation.
stone space
Sep 2016
#30
Its a real shame these women are getting death threats just because they have a different opinion
jmg257
Sep 2016
#21
Yet this member has shown no proof of such ethics in his disregard of the rules governing
oneshooter
Sep 2016
#29
This is another poster where I cannot be entirely certain this isn't an effort to
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2016
#62
You're actually defending this terroristic snuff film made about this student? WTF???
stone space
Sep 2016
#65
Personal attacks and insults do not change the fact that she is being terrorized.
stone space
Sep 2016
#67
Off topic. Has nothing to do with my post, which involves a terroristic gunhumping snuff film.
stone space
Sep 2016
#69
If you are having personal conflicts with other posters, please address site admins, not me.
stone space
Sep 2016
#71