Gun Control & RKBA

stone space

(6,498 posts)

30. Please stop spamming my OP with meta reguarding your dissapointment with DU moderation.

Sun Sep 18, 2016, 01:19 PM

Sep 2016

You know that I am unable to even reply, due to the fact that such discussions of forum moderation are in direct violation of DU's TOS.

Don't interfere with forum moderation
Don't post messages about site rules, enforcement, juries, hosts, administration, alerts, alerters, removed posts, appeals, locked threads, or anything else related to how this website is moderated (except in the Ask the Administrators forum).

Why we have this rule: The purpose of Democratic Underground is to discuss politics, issues, and current events. Open discussion of how the website is run tends to distract from our core purpose.

Even with this reply to you, I risk being hidden for violation of TOS.

That is why your constant spammy meta-baiting is annoying. You do it, in violation of TOS, knowing full well that I can have my post hidden even for discussing your disappointments regarding DU's moderation system.

If you feel that a post violates TOS, then your remedy is to alert on the post in question, not to whine repeatedly about your disappointments over jury decisions that might not go your way.

Attempting to bait others with repeated spam into meta discussions regarding forum moderation decisions is inappropriate.

Do not expect me to reply to your meta-bating spam in the future.

I am in direct violation of TOS for even replying to your meta-baiting here in this post.

NOTE TO JURORS: Please note the meta-baiting spam listed below, the sheer volume of which has made it necessary for me to reply to the meta-bating in this one single post, even if it is in direct violation of DU's TOS.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post1

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post3

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post6

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post18

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post26

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post14

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post11

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post20

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post28

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172199405#post27

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028170785#post6

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028170785#post9

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028170785#post10

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post1

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post10

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post11

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post13

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1190190#post8

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] stone space Sep 2016 OP

Please respect the copyright Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #1

Blaming the victim? Why? stone space Sep 2016 #2

Nope Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #3

This wasn't you? stone space Sep 2016 #4

Did I blame the victim, nope Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #6

What constitutes being a victim? Throck Sep 2016 #41

By "attention" you mean a threatening snuff film by some gunhumping MRA? stone space Sep 2016 #42

Please stay on point. Throck Sep 2016 #43

Welcome to DU. How are their questions on not point? uppityperson Sep 2016 #45

Human Resource departments would write her up for sexual harassment. JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #5

I guess she must be for open carry Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #7

We had a director removed because he left porn mags out. JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #9

Sounds like he has more in common with the terrorist than the victim. stone space Sep 2016 #12

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #13

Apparently so, sadly Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #15

Making false accusations against a latina student facing down domestic terrosism is a Trump move. stone space Sep 2016 #16

Funny you fail to respond to me for certain posts Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #18

I've responded to several of your posts, but they are becoming spammy and appear to be meta baiting. stone space Sep 2016 #24

I have posted several times on topic Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #26

Please stop spamming my OP with meta reguarding your dissapointment with DU moderation. stone space Sep 2016 #30

I will stop pointing out the rule Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #32

You can find a list of such posts in post #30. stone space Sep 2016 #33

You too Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #35

how is her ethnic origin relevant? gejohnston Sep 2016 #48

It gives him one more group that hasn't banned him yet to post it in? n/t DonP Sep 2016 #49

Carlos Hathcock Throck Sep 2016 #50

It isn't Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #52

She made an issue of it herself...in the linked article. jmg257 Sep 2016 #54

Why do you not follow DU Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #14

Great, now you're victim blaming. JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #17

Lol. nt Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #19

More victim blaming? stone space Sep 2016 #8

Not JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #10

Nobody is blaming the victim Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #11

Please respect DU rules Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #20

Its a real shame these women are getting death threats just because they have a different opinion jmg257 Sep 2016 #21

Death threats sarisataka Sep 2016 #22

Could it be because he has no ethics? oneshooter Sep 2016 #25

I think DU members tend to be ethical Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #28

I cannot vouch sarisataka Sep 2016 #34

OH OH OH PICK ME (HAND UP) shadowrider Sep 2016 #37

There is one "H" sarisataka Sep 2016 #39

Can I do both shadowrider Sep 2016 #40

I seem to remember he advocated Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #46

I agree Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #27

Yet this member has shown no proof of such ethics in his disregard of the rules governing oneshooter Sep 2016 #29

any idea who made the video? gejohnston Sep 2016 #23

OK, I gotta ask... tortoise1956 Sep 2016 #55

I did, hence my earlier reference gejohnston Sep 2016 #56

Sorry tortoise1956 Sep 2016 #57

The gun rights deathrind Sep 2016 #31

Gun humpers threatening a young minority woman mwrguy Sep 2016 #36

No shadowrider Sep 2016 #38

Do uppity women trigger gunhumping MRAs? stone space Sep 2016 #44

How about women who support the RKBA? Are we too uppity for you? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #58

What does this have to do with me? stone space Sep 2016 #59

Snuff film? My goodness but that is breathless scare-mongering. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #60

For some... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #61

This is another poster where I cannot be entirely certain this isn't an effort to Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #62

My thoughts discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #63

The hypocrisy is strong in some Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #64

You're actually defending this terroristic snuff film made about this student? WTF??? stone space Sep 2016 #65

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #66

Personal attacks and insults do not change the fact that she is being terrorized. stone space Sep 2016 #67

Many fellow anti-gun/rkba posters are rather quick to imply... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #68

Off topic. Has nothing to do with my post, which involves a terroristic gunhumping snuff film. stone space Sep 2016 #69

Possibly you missed it but I didn't reply to your OP. n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #70

If you are having personal conflicts with other posters, please address site admins, not me. stone space Sep 2016 #71

Do me a favor...forget I asked. discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #72

If you have evidence that this is a snuff film, gejohnston Sep 2016 #73

A snuff film sarisataka Sep 2016 #74

It's a nasty little piece of work, that's true. Straw Man Sep 2016 #47

those gun owners are dicks beergood Sep 2016 #51

Guns don't have rights....people do. ileus Sep 2016 #53