Gun Control & RKBA

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)

62. This is another poster where I cannot be entirely certain this isn't an effort to

Reply to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Reply #61)

Tue Sep 20, 2016, 02:37 PM

Sep 2016

maliciously make gun control advocates appear unhinged and belligerent.

If I wanted to create a defaming caricature of an opponent I couldn't have created one more accommodating. It's like a self-animating strawman.

Anybody with even an ounce of awareness would realize that pro-gun control groups have created ads with depictions of violence. To claim the ad in controversy in the OP is a snuff film/call to violence is to open gun control advocates to the same criticism and that is would be seized upon. Yet, here we find ourselves mired in just such a predictable scenario.

Surely, nobody is this ideologically blinded that they couldn't foresee this turn of events.

Is it performance art? Someone trolling gun control advocates? This can't be serious.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] stone space Sep 2016 OP

Please respect the copyright Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #1

Blaming the victim? Why? stone space Sep 2016 #2

Nope Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #3

This wasn't you? stone space Sep 2016 #4

Did I blame the victim, nope Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #6

What constitutes being a victim? Throck Sep 2016 #41

By "attention" you mean a threatening snuff film by some gunhumping MRA? stone space Sep 2016 #42

Please stay on point. Throck Sep 2016 #43

Welcome to DU. How are their questions on not point? uppityperson Sep 2016 #45

Human Resource departments would write her up for sexual harassment. JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #5

I guess she must be for open carry Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #7

We had a director removed because he left porn mags out. JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #9

Sounds like he has more in common with the terrorist than the victim. stone space Sep 2016 #12

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #13

Apparently so, sadly Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #15

Making false accusations against a latina student facing down domestic terrosism is a Trump move. stone space Sep 2016 #16

Funny you fail to respond to me for certain posts Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #18

I've responded to several of your posts, but they are becoming spammy and appear to be meta baiting. stone space Sep 2016 #24

I have posted several times on topic Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #26

Please stop spamming my OP with meta reguarding your dissapointment with DU moderation. stone space Sep 2016 #30

I will stop pointing out the rule Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #32

You can find a list of such posts in post #30. stone space Sep 2016 #33

You too Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #35

how is her ethnic origin relevant? gejohnston Sep 2016 #48

It gives him one more group that hasn't banned him yet to post it in? n/t DonP Sep 2016 #49

Carlos Hathcock Throck Sep 2016 #50

It isn't Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #52

She made an issue of it herself...in the linked article. jmg257 Sep 2016 #54

Why do you not follow DU Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #14

Great, now you're victim blaming. JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #17

Lol. nt Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #19

More victim blaming? stone space Sep 2016 #8

Not JonathanRackham Sep 2016 #10

Nobody is blaming the victim Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #11

Please respect DU rules Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #20

Its a real shame these women are getting death threats just because they have a different opinion jmg257 Sep 2016 #21

Death threats sarisataka Sep 2016 #22

Could it be because he has no ethics? oneshooter Sep 2016 #25

I think DU members tend to be ethical Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #28

I cannot vouch sarisataka Sep 2016 #34

OH OH OH PICK ME (HAND UP) shadowrider Sep 2016 #37

There is one "H" sarisataka Sep 2016 #39

Can I do both shadowrider Sep 2016 #40

I seem to remember he advocated Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #46

I agree Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #27

Yet this member has shown no proof of such ethics in his disregard of the rules governing oneshooter Sep 2016 #29

any idea who made the video? gejohnston Sep 2016 #23

OK, I gotta ask... tortoise1956 Sep 2016 #55

I did, hence my earlier reference gejohnston Sep 2016 #56

Sorry tortoise1956 Sep 2016 #57

The gun rights deathrind Sep 2016 #31

Gun humpers threatening a young minority woman mwrguy Sep 2016 #36

No shadowrider Sep 2016 #38

Do uppity women trigger gunhumping MRAs? stone space Sep 2016 #44

How about women who support the RKBA? Are we too uppity for you? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #58

What does this have to do with me? stone space Sep 2016 #59

Snuff film? My goodness but that is breathless scare-mongering. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #60

For some... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #61

This is another poster where I cannot be entirely certain this isn't an effort to Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #62

My thoughts discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #63

The hypocrisy is strong in some Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #64

You're actually defending this terroristic snuff film made about this student? WTF??? stone space Sep 2016 #65

Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #66

Personal attacks and insults do not change the fact that she is being terrorized. stone space Sep 2016 #67

Many fellow anti-gun/rkba posters are rather quick to imply... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #68

Off topic. Has nothing to do with my post, which involves a terroristic gunhumping snuff film. stone space Sep 2016 #69

Possibly you missed it but I didn't reply to your OP. n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #70

If you are having personal conflicts with other posters, please address site admins, not me. stone space Sep 2016 #71

Do me a favor...forget I asked. discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #72

If you have evidence that this is a snuff film, gejohnston Sep 2016 #73

A snuff film sarisataka Sep 2016 #74

It's a nasty little piece of work, that's true. Straw Man Sep 2016 #47

those gun owners are dicks beergood Sep 2016 #51

Guns don't have rights....people do. ileus Sep 2016 #53