Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Media

theexwife

(52 posts)

8. I see your point but...

Reply to rocktivity (Original post)

Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:28 AM

Jul 2014

I have to agree with further responses within the thread touching on the subject of dressing to compliment the whole overall reason why she is on the cover. She isn't a nun and dressing that way is a part of show business. So I say it isn't inappropriate at all given the nature of her profession.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Uproar over Beyonce's Time magazine cover: 'Why is she in her underwear?' [View all] rocktivity Apr 2014 OP

It doesn't look like underwear to me upaloopa Apr 2014 #1

TIME photographed and cropped Beyonce different from the others Auggie Apr 2014 #2

Sales-boosting or not, it makes perfect sense to feature more of Beyonce's body rocktivity Apr 2014 #4

Hopefully there are no Kardashians on that list..n/t monmouth3 Apr 2014 #3

Looks like a swimsuit from 1958 HockeyMom Apr 2014 #5

She is covered up enough, but why... alfie Apr 2014 #6

Hmmm let's see here..beautiful? Check! GOLGO 13 Jun 2014 #7

I see your point but... theexwife Jul 2014 #8

UPDATE: Beyonce labeled partly "Anti-Feminist" and a "terrorist" by feminist scholar rocktivity Jul 2014 #9