Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(102,897 posts)
11. That seems to be her claiming she *ought to* win, not that she has won
Sun Mar 31, 2024, 01:18 PM
Mar 2024

She claims she just did it "for the truth", but has continued to claim the innocent professor "might have" done it, even after the charging of someone else.

It looks like malice (and greed - hence the claim for $1m) to me, but I'm not confident US courts will see it provable that it's malice.

I can't find any news item later than that, so I guess this has not yet got to court, or been settled.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»"Psychic" gets a murder c...»Reply #11