Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Vinca

(51,041 posts)
81. Curious. I was reading responses to an article on HuffPo and someone said
Sat Dec 3, 2016, 02:04 PM
Dec 2016

they lived in a really red county in Arizona and were certain people known to be voting for Trump were given 2 ballots. Of course, anyone can say anything on the Internet, but it would explain more votes than voters.

Stolen MFM008 Dec 2016 #1
Not much of an error rate, assuming it is even legit. They are going to have to find a lot more Hoyt Dec 2016 #2
Except that these are individual ward numbers and there are over 5,000 wards. ffr Dec 2016 #8
That is more votes than voters. Not turnout. n/t rzemanfl Dec 2016 #3
I don't understand. Wouldn't turnout be synonymous with votes? ffr Dec 2016 #5
Precinct X has 100 registered voters. 50 of them vote, the rest don't. Turnout is 50%. If there rzemanfl Dec 2016 #6
Exactly. What's your point? ffr Dec 2016 #9
So you are saying- rzemanfl Dec 2016 #11
That's what it appears Isa Lee is saying. I'm just relaying what she wrote ffr Dec 2016 #14
I think she is saying "voters"number of ballots. In other words, more votes recorded than were rzemanfl Dec 2016 #17
If she meant ballots, why didn't she use that word instead of voters? ffr Dec 2016 #19
I see what you're saying now. Let's see if that follows with what she says. ffr Dec 2016 #22
He is saying that every registered voter, plus a few extra, cast a ballot. Election fraud. Nay Dec 2016 #15
I agree that would be fraud. It seems to me that when a "registered voter" rzemanfl Dec 2016 #24
I don't find that credible, either. BlueProgressive Dec 2016 #47
So would 90% and 95% TNNurse Dec 2016 #53
it must be all those dead Trump voters putitinD Dec 2016 #4
Remember Josef Stalin Once got 111% of the vote Wolf Frankula Dec 2016 #7
RIGGED Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #10
Trump said so! Beartracks Dec 2016 #89
Why should I not believe bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #12
Humans, like you and me, recognize patterns. It is the patterns we're trying to reconcile ffr Dec 2016 #16
ain't nothing normal about my state jodymarie aimee Dec 2016 #13
Everyone knows that Hell is in Michigan. But Wiscosin is Hell, adjacent. At least under Walker. Thor_MN Dec 2016 #62
You know why Wisconsin doesn't fall into Lake Michigan? Ellipsis Dec 2016 #64
You need to do some remedial Geography work. Thor_MN Dec 2016 #66
Wisconsin is next to Minnesota and Lake Michigan Except for the "Upers". Ellipsis Dec 2016 #69
So the election in fraudulant humbled_opinion Dec 2016 #18
If there is proof beyond reasonable doubt, how can the fucker take office? lonestarnot Dec 2016 #30
Because post truth and depraved indifference pink-o Dec 2016 #67
The problem isn't what he knows it's what he can prove and barring cstanleytech Dec 2016 #87
If more than 100% of registered voters standingtall Dec 2016 #20
She may have worded her comments awkwardly. See post above ffr Dec 2016 #23
The polling and the results don't add up like never before, that much is certain. Coyotl Dec 2016 #21
Looks like hints oof widespread election frud. triron Dec 2016 #25
Ever wonder how Walker made it through his recall election Botany Dec 2016 #26
K&R drm604 Dec 2016 #27
I can't believe that people on THIS forum are questionning this... strongermessage Dec 2016 #28
The op was interpreting standingtall Dec 2016 #32
Yep! Yep and Yep! Fucker! Bet he doesn't get confirmed. Keep counting! lonestarnot Dec 2016 #29
I'll take that bet GummyBearz Dec 2016 #72
Since it appears about as important as gummy bears that a cheat took place, I'll bet you five gummy lonestarnot Dec 2016 #73
Something about that color just bugs me lately GummyBearz Dec 2016 #77
Cool the seismologist... If it's there, he will find it. Looks like he did. Ellipsis Dec 2016 #31
Trump was right. It truly WAS RIGGED....for him!!! AgadorSparticus Dec 2016 #33
Will the msm have the backbone standingtall Dec 2016 #34
More tinfoil hat bs hueymahl Dec 2016 #35
Sure because greater then 100% of the recorded vote happens all the time Botany Dec 2016 #36
clearly there was a mistake hueymahl Dec 2016 #37
This was not a mistake Botany Dec 2016 #39
So mistakes that disproportionately standingtall Dec 2016 #42
It's math. I have been voting since 1964, and have yet to Bohunk68 Dec 2016 #49
40% Voter fraud would be extraordinary, 40% Election fraud is another story. Thor_MN Dec 2016 #63
Simple math .. strongermessage Dec 2016 #59
But we need a straw to grasp. HassleCat Dec 2016 #79
Yep. Well put. NT hueymahl Dec 2016 #91
Loving County, TX has more than 100% turnout every election jfern Dec 2016 #38
I looked up Loving county Texas standingtall Dec 2016 #41
As they say on my mom's side of the family HassleCat Dec 2016 #40
Good lord this is ridiculously clear. byronius Dec 2016 #43
All I've seen so far is Chuck Todd gloating over Hillary's loss. Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2016 #46
KnR Hekate Dec 2016 #44
What was it Trump said? Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2016 #45
On twitter they said there was evidence of tampering w/recount machines which led to a link MADem Dec 2016 #48
Without seeing the whole roster of wards DFW Dec 2016 #50
Glad I kicked into Stein's recount fund Omaha Steve Dec 2016 #51
Interesting. rzemanfl Dec 2016 #52
2012 Total votes (Presidential) rzemanfl Dec 2016 #54
outside of the township of cedar rapids Botany Dec 2016 #55
What I found interesting was that rzemanfl Dec 2016 #56
Beth Clarkson a professor of math and engineering @ Wichta State U. did a study and ... Botany Dec 2016 #57
In Wisconsin, we've been screaming foul Greybnk48 Dec 2016 #58
We have no way of knowing how many registered voters there are? Bullshit. Thor_MN Dec 2016 #60
They didn't share the up to date info with Phillips Ellipsis Dec 2016 #61
Gotcha. I didn't realise that quote was from an outsider, not an election official. Thor_MN Dec 2016 #65
Richard Hayes Phillips is no Outsider. Ellipsis Dec 2016 #70
Outsider, as in, not an election official defending their results. Thor_MN Dec 2016 #71
Shameful that this election handled by Americans conducted in this manner. Something truly stinks. lonestarnot Dec 2016 #68
St. Croix County WI suspicious activity in re-count room 1876em Dec 2016 #74
I saw that video. But that same lady is in another video with other people ffr Dec 2016 #75
Video 1876em Dec 2016 #76
Yeah, but she felt it would save some time and she could take care of it herself. ffr Dec 2016 #78
Video 1876em Dec 2016 #80
Being a skeptical deductive thinker will do that. When something doesn't seem right ffr Dec 2016 #82
Curious. I was reading responses to an article on HuffPo and someone said Vinca Dec 2016 #81
St. Croix County WI video 1876em Dec 2016 #83
Former Trump Advisor: Scott Walker Has 'Rigged' 5 Elections Jeroen Dec 2016 #84
Roger Stone and Scott Walker 1876em Dec 2016 #85
I'm curious how military votes are handled? OnlinePoker Dec 2016 #86
Remember Michelle Obama's speech about just a couple votes... Beartracks Dec 2016 #88
Just imagine trying to sit down in a court room with these numbers turbinetree Dec 2016 #90
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hold onto your hats, Wisc...»Reply #81