Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Sanders's secret is out: He has no movement - The Washington Post [View all]
I have never taken sanders seriously as a candidate due to sanders complete and utter lack of legislative accomplishments. sanders has not been able to get his fellow Democratic members of Congress to back his agenda and that is not going to change. As I understand it, sanders is now relying on a magical voter revolution to convince republicans to be reasonable. sanders has no magical voter revolution or movement backing him up. sanders has a cap of around 30% of the Democratic voters and that does not constitute a movement or revolution
Link to tweet
For months for years, really the media have reported that the Democratic Party has gone far left. They have treated social media as a barometer of the partys political attitudes and characterized center-left candidates as out of touch with their own party. They have done so despite the triumph of moderate Democratic House candidates in 2018; despite the failure of left-wing Democrats to flip a single House seat; despite the polls showing a substantial percentage of Democrats consider themselves moderate or somewhat liberal; and despite the failure of super-progressive presidential candidates to attract the most critical element in the Democratic Party (African Americans).
With this faulty premise, the medias coverage has been at times wildly off-kilter. It was easy for anyone caring to look closely to see that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) did not win a single debate, because his ranting and raving merely reinforced the fervor of his own cult while turning off the rest of the party. The media have been obsessed with the likability of female candidates, never considering that Sanderss angry and rude demeanor would turn off women, who make up more than half of the Democratic electorate. A simple question Who is he gaining by all this yelling? should have been front and center in the medias coverage. His movement was assumed but never examined carefully.....
Sanderss ceiling turned out to be real, because there are generally less than a third of voters in the Democratic Party willing to embrace wide-eyed socialism, venom-filled rhetoric and utter disregard for the demands of governing (e.g. compromise). Michael Moore does not speak for the Democratic Party any more than Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) speaks for House Democrats. (I have long maintained that the person who has the best read on the party as a whole is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi; get to her left, and you are in no-mans land.)
The Democratic Party does not live on social media nor does it favor bomb-throwers. If anything, it is desperate to play it safe and find an antidote to President Trump not an imitation. Voters want the madness, the cruelty, the dysfunction and the stupidity to stop. They have found their safe, reliable and decent candidate in Biden. En masse in every geographic region and Democratic group they are telling us that they want the primary to end and the effort to rout Trump to begin. The media might have taken Sanderss revolution seriously, but it turns out that Democratic voters as a whole did not.
With this faulty premise, the medias coverage has been at times wildly off-kilter. It was easy for anyone caring to look closely to see that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) did not win a single debate, because his ranting and raving merely reinforced the fervor of his own cult while turning off the rest of the party. The media have been obsessed with the likability of female candidates, never considering that Sanderss angry and rude demeanor would turn off women, who make up more than half of the Democratic electorate. A simple question Who is he gaining by all this yelling? should have been front and center in the medias coverage. His movement was assumed but never examined carefully.....
Sanderss ceiling turned out to be real, because there are generally less than a third of voters in the Democratic Party willing to embrace wide-eyed socialism, venom-filled rhetoric and utter disregard for the demands of governing (e.g. compromise). Michael Moore does not speak for the Democratic Party any more than Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) speaks for House Democrats. (I have long maintained that the person who has the best read on the party as a whole is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi; get to her left, and you are in no-mans land.)
The Democratic Party does not live on social media nor does it favor bomb-throwers. If anything, it is desperate to play it safe and find an antidote to President Trump not an imitation. Voters want the madness, the cruelty, the dysfunction and the stupidity to stop. They have found their safe, reliable and decent candidate in Biden. En masse in every geographic region and Democratic group they are telling us that they want the primary to end and the effort to rout Trump to begin. The media might have taken Sanderss revolution seriously, but it turns out that Democratic voters as a whole did not.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
115 replies, 14777 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (109)
ReplyReply to this post
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jennifer Rubin is a right-winger who accused Obama of siding with the "Muslim World" over the US.
DanTex
Mar 2020
#1
Well...it is # of delegates is what counts, not how many votes, to win nomination.
at140
Mar 2020
#12
I'm sure we'll find out in time, exactly who thought up that hair-brained plan, but it was at best
OnDoutside
Mar 2020
#16
This is an interesting comment on Senator Warren by Krugman. I regret that I will...
NNadir
Mar 2020
#36
" Jennifer Rubin is an American conservative columnist who writes the "Right Turn" blog for
pampango
Mar 2020
#20
I don't go to liberal sites to play the 'show me where this conservative is wrong' game.
pampango
Mar 2020
#75
I try not to respond when someone posts an article from a conservative and then expects me to agree
pampango
Mar 2020
#76
The point of posting conservative's opinion to a liberal board in the hope that liberals would agree
pampango
Mar 2020
#87
If you consider "ad hominem" to include refusing to acknowledge "Yeah, this conservative is
pampango
Mar 2020
#88
I am 'attacking' the idea of posting conservative's opinion pieces to a liberal site and expecting
pampango
Mar 2020
#94
LOL. That's rich coming from a regular poster of the Democrat-hating Jacobin articles.
ehrnst
Mar 2020
#54
i call BULL on that. she is on msnbc all the sound and she does not sound like a right winger
trueblue2007
Mar 2020
#112
You post Jacobin articles, and they have trashed the Democratic party - CURRENTLY -
ehrnst
Mar 2020
#52
Cenk's GOP past misogyny isn't an issue for you now since Bernie endorsed him...
ehrnst
Mar 2020
#62
MSM has really been taken in. They propped up the idea of a non-existent revolution and a
emmaverybo
Mar 2020
#10
i always wondered why he waited until 2016 to start this all important 'movement'
samnsara
Mar 2020
#11
Thank you Gothmog. The voters spoke in 18 and are speaking again. Big NO to our revolution
Thekaspervote
Mar 2020
#32
He began his career at the University of Chicago in 1962 with a segration protest
LiberalFighter
Mar 2020
#46
He didn't get noticed until he did that 8 1/2 hour filibuster in 2010 & put out a book about it.
Scurrilous
Mar 2020
#71
I was watching that during the last debate - Biden looked about 2 inches taller.
George II
Mar 2020
#44
Just because Bernie is not going to the White House doesn't mean he's not needed in the Senate.
marble falls
Mar 2020
#24
Sources more hateful than Rubin has been (especially lately) are praised here on DU.
ehrnst
Mar 2020
#60
i literally joined like an hour ago so idk what the precedent here is for bad sources
FrozenMoonage
Mar 2020
#65
The assessment of Sanders' demeanor has been made by others, including his workers, for years.
ehrnst
Mar 2020
#72
I can't see myself being able to tolerate being scolded nonstop for the next four years.
calimary
Mar 2020
#70
I think it will live on as a purity testing service named The Bernie Center for Progressive Politics
dalton99a
Mar 2020
#89
LOL Then sanders needs to say in the primary and lose some more primaries by large margins
Gothmog
Mar 2020
#99