Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cable News Clips

(3,245 posts)

13. And Clarence obviously doesn't want to invalidate Loving vs Virginia, and give up old teabag Ginni.

Thu Apr 16, 2026, 11:13 AM

Apr 16

I got mine, screw the rest of you. It’s his theory of jurisprudence.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And what values might those be, Uncle Thomas? Ocelot II Apr 16 #1

The document signed by several dozen slave holders. displacedvermoter Apr 16 #2

41 of them, it seems, were slaveholders displacedvermoter Apr 16 #4

But for progressivism Clarence would be a slave. sop Apr 16 #3

That was my first reaction Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 16 #15

And I have the same answer for that question... Harker Apr 16 #5

Fuck you. SamKnause Apr 16 #6

His honor may go fuck himself in that Garden of Dictators Blue Owl Apr 16 #7

Fuck that dirty old pervert. Autumn Apr 16 #9

Good. We've got him on the run. Baitball Blogger Apr 16 #12

Well, a corrupt effer knows who's handing him his perks struggle4progress Apr 16 #17

Isn't it a screed based in hate not logic? FDRFTW Apr 17 #18